Comments on: Why?: Kings 96 – Bucks 95

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:57:03 +0000

Gadz has a strained patella I believe. He also isn’t good.

By: imnotjesus

imnotjesus — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:11:51 +0000

i was at the game. Bell came in for the last play on offense for LRMAM, then replaced Jennings for the last play on defense… and gave up the winning layup (with “help” from Bogut).

Also, free throws free throws free throws. please make some free throws. please.

Team defense is a major issue for the Bucks right now. Ilyasova played some tough defense on the wing only to have breakdowns behind him lead to easy baskets on more than one occasion.

Redd is completely out of sync with the rest of the team and clearly doesn’t have… something… back yet. He looks really bad.

Bogut cannot consistently hit the jump hook if it’s contested. He may be listed at 7 feet, but he plays much shorter than that, except for help defense when he’s able to get a running start to block shots.

Tyreke Evans and Jennings both played well, but Evans showed that he has a more polished game overall. He really reminds me of Dwyane Wade, except with a bigger upper body. I think he could be that good. And i was the one that thought he’d be a classic tweener bust coming out of college. I’m a convert now.

Also, i noticed that Dan Gadzuric was not with the team last night. Meeks and Elson were active and only Joe Alexander was in street clothes on the bench. Anyone know what’s up with DannyG?

By: Milwaukee_Buck

Milwaukee_Buck — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:59:35 +0000

And to generate some fans and media coverage.

By: Milwaukee_Buck

Milwaukee_Buck — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:58:34 +0000

It’s time to come down to earth about the MKE Bucks. After this past week, I had to realize that the Bucks aren’t playing for the championship necessarily. They are playing for experience, respect, and a playoff seed. They are acheiving those goals at this point, not excelling in them, but succeeding.

By: patrick monaghan

patrick monaghan — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:25:29 +0000

this was a very good piece i was very impressed with how the bucks managed it early on but they really do need to start closing out games or else i hope they can do that soon.

By: JuniourJack

JuniourJack — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:01:27 +0000

Bucks lost because Ilyasova played less than 30 mins ok maybe 29? forget about Jennings. did you ever watch while he was playing in Europe? he was close to “nothing”. If you give the ball and allow him shoot like this, of course he will score 19-20 pts but what about rhytm? Day by day, he is more looking like a spoiled child to me anyways. If Ily plays less than 30 mins, then Bucks will lose a lot games this season, thats my bet.