Archive

Archive for January, 2010

Game 44 Preview: Bucks vs. Sixers

January 27th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt Comments off

Milwaukee Bucks (Scott Skiles) 18-25

(Probable) Inactives: Joe Alexander, Michael Redd and Francisco Elson

Vs.

Philadelphia 76ers (Eddie Jordan) 15-29

(Probable) Inactives:  Primoz Brezec and Jason Kapono

Date: 1/27/2010

Game Time: 7:00 (CST)

TV: FS Wisconsin

Match-Ups

Point Guard

Brandon Jennings vs. Jrue Holiday

The guy the Bucks drafted versus the guy they thought about drafting.  It’s safe to say, that for this year the Bucks should be glad they went with Jennings.  Holiday is already a better defender than Jennings, but not the playmaker or shot-taker (and occasional shot-maker) that BJ is.  Holiday has only recently been given the keys to the car that is the starting line-up and is kind of taking on the “Royal Ivey Memorial Starting Point Guard” role.  He’s getting around 15 minutes, is expected to play defense, distribute the ball and not make mistakes.  It will be interesting to see if Jennings has a little extra pep in his step going at another rookie.

Advantage: Bucks Read more…

Bucks Lose Another Battle, Inch Closer Towards Winning the War: Mavs 108 – Bucks 107

January 26th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt 2 comments

Recap/Box Score

I’ve been told I’m turning into a negative person.

My gut reaction is to feel bad about the Bucks one point heartbreaker of a loss.  I want to complain about the tough shots Dirk Nowitzki and Jason Terry hit on a regular basis, as I wonder why the Bucks can’t seem to ever find guys to hit those same shots.  I want to question the decision making of the Bucks rookie point guard down the stretch and rue the coaching staff for not letting the better shooter handle the ball when it was clear shots would need to be made.  I want to be a little bitter about the whole experience and that’s what a negative person would do.

Yet I find myself incapable of performing in that role.  I just feel too good about the whole thing to let any negativity interfere.  Sure, some things could have been done better and the Bucks could have come out with a win.  But when Milwaukee can head out on the road into the Western Conference and play a division leader to a virtual standstill it’s hard for me to feel very empty.

(Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images) Bogut's play may or may not have been inspiried by the Rum Rebellion on this Australia Day

(Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images) Bogut's play may or may not have been inspiried by the Rum Rebellion on this Australia Day

The Bucks gave Dallas their very best shot – literally.  The 53.3 percent Milwaukee shot in this one was as good a performance as they’ve had on the road all year.  A lot of that had to do with Andrew Bogut’s all-starish 13-14 (6-8 from the stripe) for a career high 32 point performance.

Bogut was matching the superstar Dirk shot for shot in the fourth quarter.  So what was it that allowed the Mavericks to prevail if Bogut was a pseudo-superstar in this one?  Well when the Bucks would have to send double teams over at Dirk, he was able to kick out to guards that combined to shoot 10-16 on threes.  Bogut was skipping it around to guards that finished the night 4-11 on their own three-point shots.  Having a superstar is one thing; having everyone else step up to the plate to make their shots is another. Read more…

Game 43 Preview: Bucks at Mavericks

January 26th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt Comments off

Milwaukee Bucks (18-24)

(Probable) Inactives: Michael Redd, Joe Alexander and Francisco Elson

at

Dallas Mavericks (29-15)

(Probable) Inactives: Eduardo Najera and Matt Carroll

Game Time: 7:30 (CST)

Date: 1/26/2010

TV: FS Wisconsin

Match-Ups

Point Guard

Brandon Jennings vs. Jason Kidd

Kidd was absent from the Mavs 50 point shellacking of the New York Knicks on Sunday, but should be ready to go when Milwaukee comes to town.  Kidd doesn’t have the necessary quickness to stick with Jennings anymore, so Jennings should be in full on attack mode Tuesday night.  I’ve said it many times before, Jennings needs to get to the rim for the Bucks to get easy shots and he should be able to get into the paint for those shots against Kidd.  The hitch in that plan could come if the Mavs go to Rodrigue Beaubois at all – he has more than enough speed to stay with Jennings.  Of course, the flip side with Kidd is that he can hit the open three if Jennings gets lost, which he’s prone to do on picks.

Advantage: Mavs Read more…

Men Lie, Women Lie and Sometimes Numbers do too

January 25th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt Comments off

If you’ve never been to Hoopdata.com, then you’re missing out on a lot of great basketball information.  Does it seem like your team gives up a lot of shots at the rim?  Go to Hoopdata and they’ll verify your suspicions.  Think you’re team sucks at shooting mid-range jumpers?  Hoopdata can tell you whether or not they do.  Think your scrappy power forward draws a lot of charges?  Hoopdata tracks that too.

It’s awesome.

Occasionally they’ll have some interesting charts and graphs about things too.  One of these recent “things” was the at rim field goal percentages of Brandon Jennings and Tyreke Evans.  In short, Jennings had a great start but has tailed off considerably, whereas Evans has been climbing and performing very well all year.  If I told you Tyreke Evans was doing a much better job finishing at the rim than Brandon Jennings coming into the year, you probably would have said, “Well duh, he’s got five inches and fifty pounds on him,” and that would have made sense to us both.

So it’s no surprise to me that Evans is doing such a good job at the rim while Jennings has struggled.  However, I’ve maintained that it’s important for Jennings to continue to attack the rim and be aggressive despite his misses for a couple reasons.  One, he’ll probably get better at finishing as his career goes on and it’s important to develop good habits as a young player.  He’s bound to add some more muscle, so that should help him absorb contact.  On top of that, as he grows as a player, he should figure out how to better shield the ball from shot-blockers and draw more fouls.  That’s all down the road stuff though.  In the meantime it’s still benefiting the Bucks when Jennings is going to the rack, poor shooting percentage be damned.

(Photo by Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Images) Brandon Jennings needs to keep getting to the rack for the Bucks

(Photo by Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Images) Brandon Jennings needs to keep getting to the rack for the Bucks

Through his last six games, Jennings is just 11-26 at the rim, just 42.3 percent, but when we look behind the numbers things actually look a lot better.  On seven of those attempts, the Bucks secured the offensive rebound and scored a basket, typically a tip shot or layup.  One time the Bucks had to take it back out, but that just resulted in a driving basket by Luc Richard Mbah a Moute (he grabbed the initial rebound as well).  So add those seven baskets off the rebounds to Jennings 11-26 and suddenly we have 26 attempts at the rim resulting in 18 makes and 69.2 percent shooting.  That’s not bad.

I’m sure Jennings is not alone in his ability to draw defenders and open up easy opportunities for teammates when he attacks the rim, but for this team it’s especially important.  The Bucks are a very good offensive rebounding squad (eighth in the league) and a very bad offensive team.  Any opportunities the Bucks have for easy shots at the rim have to be exploited.  Not many Bucks excel at creating their own shot or getting good looks at the rim, so the more Jennings heads to the rack, whether he makes it or misses it, the better the Bucks are sure to fare when it comes to actual scoring.  His shooting percentage may not pick up for a while, but as long as the Bucks are getting better looks because of his shots everything will take care of itself.

The Wild and Wacky Bucks Rotation

January 24th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt 3 comments

As of today (Sunday) the Milwaukee Bucks have ten players averaging over 20 minutes per game, nine Bucks have not played in a game due to a coach’s decision, ten different players have started a game this season and just two players have started in every game they’ve played.

It’s been season long rotation roulette for the Bucks.

Is that merely the product of having numerous players with an equal number of talent and flaws or has coach Scott Skiles been tampering too much with a rotation that merely needs consistency to produce consistent results?  I got the chance to ask coach Skiles about this before the game on Saturday.

“When you’re searching like a lot of teams are and we are a little bit still with finding consistency sometimes a guy gets left out.”

So is the depth a good problem to have?

“Well it would be if we were 24-17 and not 17-24.  We do have any number of guys that can play different positions and are obviously NBA players and all that, but all of our guys need to become more consistent and play better.”

The question that arises then is would more minutes lead to more consistent production for certain players, or do they need to earn the minutes with steady production.  The case of Carlos Delfino is an interesting one to look at.

"I WANT MORE MINUTES IN THE NBA!"

"I WANT MORE MINUTES IN THE NBA!"

Lately, Delfino has had as fine a stretch of basketball as he’s had in his entire NBA career.  Over his last six games, Delfino is averaging 17.7 points and eight rebounds while shooting 41.8 percent from behind the arc and 52 percent total shooting.  In a related matter, Delfino is averaging 36 minutes per game during that same stretch.  It’s easy to come to the conclusion that Delfino’s increased minutes have made him more comfortable on the court and resulted in the production boom.  But it’s not necessarily fact. Read more…