<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unsatisfying Victory is Still a Victory: Bucks 98 &#8211; Pacers 94</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/03/an-unsatisfying-victory-is-still-a-victory-bucks-98-pacers-94/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/03/an-unsatisfying-victory-is-still-a-victory-bucks-98-pacers-94/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer News: Milwaukee Bucks (36-29) &#124; Hooped Up</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/03/an-unsatisfying-victory-is-still-a-victory-bucks-98-pacers-94/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer News: Milwaukee Bucks (36-29) &#124; Hooped Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1329#comment-1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pacers level, which made for some sloppy basketball and an overall unsatisfying experience&#8230; Bucksketball         Share and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pacers level, which made for some sloppy basketball and an overall unsatisfying experience&#8230; Bucksketball         Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/03/an-unsatisfying-victory-is-still-a-victory-bucks-98-pacers-94/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1329#comment-1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at this game, and the Bucks owned it easily until 4:00 in the 4th quarter.  And even then, when up only 2, it didn&#039;t seem like the Bucks were going to lose.  I just think after winning against the Cavs, Celtics, and Jazz they took a huge lead against the Pacers and coasted.  Still, a win is a win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at this game, and the Bucks owned it easily until 4:00 in the 4th quarter.  And even then, when up only 2, it didn&#8217;t seem like the Bucks were going to lose.  I just think after winning against the Cavs, Celtics, and Jazz they took a huge lead against the Pacers and coasted.  Still, a win is a win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Robeson</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/03/an-unsatisfying-victory-is-still-a-victory-bucks-98-pacers-94/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Robeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1329#comment-1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The win would be all the more satisfying if the Journal Sentinel would publish NBA standings in a sensible format.  They insist on showing them by division (largely meaningless) instead of by conference (you know, how the playoff teams ACTUALLY are determined).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The win would be all the more satisfying if the Journal Sentinel would publish NBA standings in a sensible format.  They insist on showing them by division (largely meaningless) instead of by conference (you know, how the playoff teams ACTUALLY are determined).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
