Comments on: Buck Hits 3-15

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:58:45 +0000

Rich and Clint – Absolutely. I didn’t mention that, but yes, that’s a very important note. That may actually be more realistic than catching the Hawks too.

By: Clint

Clint — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:13:02 +0000

We cannot get the 4th seed from Boston, but if we have a better record at the 5th seed than boston has at the 4th seed, we would get home court advantage in the first round.

By: Rich

Rich — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:10:26 +0000

@Jeremy- it’s also good to point out that seeding doesn’t matter for homecourt advantage. So, conceivably, the Celts would be a 4 seed by winning their division, but if the Bucks have the better record (5GB and Celts falling apart), we will play 4 at home in the first round, which is what i think matters.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:00:45 +0000

Boston is guaranteed at least a fourth seed in the playoffs by virtue of winning their division, but with two games left against the Hawks and Celts each (three at home) I don’t think it’s out of the question that we slide into the top four and the Hawks fall out.

By: John

John — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:58:03 +0000

I liked it better when no one understood that the Bucks were a good team. Now, there are expectations! Let’s hope the team keeps it’s focus & stays away from the injury bug.

As for 3rd in the East . . . my take is actually 4th. I can see them beating Boston, but Atlanta is another story.

By: Milwaukee_Buck

Milwaukee_Buck — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:31:49 +0000

With 17 games left and 2 with Boston, while MKE is surging forward and Boston surging backward is it completely out of the question that they catch up for the 4th spot? That would be one heck of a run and story. If its even close what a last 3 games of the season it will be!