<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12 Men: 1 Skill (Part One: 6-1-10 Workouts)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/06/12-men-1-skill-part-one-6-1-10-workouts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/06/12-men-1-skill-part-one-6-1-10-workouts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milwaukee_Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/06/12-men-1-skill-part-one-6-1-10-workouts/comment-page-1/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>Milwaukee_Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1646#comment-2512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crawford and Garcia.  Anything else (from this group) would be uncivilized.  

I think that the reviews of these two guys from Draft Express is much more positive than the review stated here.  Clearly shooting percentage, Garcia&#039;s case, goes down when you are getting double and triple teamed.  He gets to the line, he gets buckets, he&#039;s physical, sizeable, and athletic.  Crawford just has a knack for scoring that looks like it translates better than Jones.  When I think of Jordan Crawford, I think of Joe Crawford, Flip Murray, or Marcus Thornton.  Scorers that are cocky, score.  Meeks will not be in the league much longer doesn&#039;t have the chip on his shoulder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crawford and Garcia.  Anything else (from this group) would be uncivilized.  </p>
<p>I think that the reviews of these two guys from Draft Express is much more positive than the review stated here.  Clearly shooting percentage, Garcia&#8217;s case, goes down when you are getting double and triple teamed.  He gets to the line, he gets buckets, he&#8217;s physical, sizeable, and athletic.  Crawford just has a knack for scoring that looks like it translates better than Jones.  When I think of Jordan Crawford, I think of Joe Crawford, Flip Murray, or Marcus Thornton.  Scorers that are cocky, score.  Meeks will not be in the league much longer doesn&#8217;t have the chip on his shoulder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/06/12-men-1-skill-part-one-6-1-10-workouts/comment-page-1/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1646#comment-2510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps. In the interest of comparisons, here are Chad Ford&#039;s pre-draft comments on Meeks and Crawford.

&quot;Meeks: Meeks was a scoring machine at Kentucky this season. His speed and shooting ability really stood out. So did that 54-point performance against Tennessee. However, his lack of great size or explosive athleticism hurts his stock a bit. He&#039;s a second-rounder if he stays in the draft. More likely, he returns to Kentucky for his senior season and lets John Calipari work his magic.

Crawford: He&#039;s a big-time scorer who has deep, deep range and combines that with terrific athleticism. If teams weren&#039;t so concerned about his attitude, he&#039;d be a lock for the first round.&quot;

Meeks surprised me with his athleticism when he was on the Bucks, I think it was better than most people expected. Their combine numbers nearly unanimously favor Meeks save for wingspan and no-step vertical, but that can be deceiving. Meeks&#039; max vertical was three inches higher than Crawfords and he tested quicker/faster. Meeks&#039; handle did leave something to be desired, but he was not afraid to man up defensively. He impressed in that regard. I guess we&#039;ll have to wait and see how things shake out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps. In the interest of comparisons, here are Chad Ford&#8217;s pre-draft comments on Meeks and Crawford.</p>
<p>&#8220;Meeks: Meeks was a scoring machine at Kentucky this season. His speed and shooting ability really stood out. So did that 54-point performance against Tennessee. However, his lack of great size or explosive athleticism hurts his stock a bit. He&#8217;s a second-rounder if he stays in the draft. More likely, he returns to Kentucky for his senior season and lets John Calipari work his magic.</p>
<p>Crawford: He&#8217;s a big-time scorer who has deep, deep range and combines that with terrific athleticism. If teams weren&#8217;t so concerned about his attitude, he&#8217;d be a lock for the first round.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meeks surprised me with his athleticism when he was on the Bucks, I think it was better than most people expected. Their combine numbers nearly unanimously favor Meeks save for wingspan and no-step vertical, but that can be deceiving. Meeks&#8217; max vertical was three inches higher than Crawfords and he tested quicker/faster. Meeks&#8217; handle did leave something to be desired, but he was not afraid to man up defensively. He impressed in that regard. I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait and see how things shake out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/06/12-men-1-skill-part-one-6-1-10-workouts/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1646#comment-2509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your comments about Crawford are ludicrious. Crawford and Jones will both be better players than Meeks. Meeks could shoot the ball (needed better accuracy), but his defense and handle was much worse than both Crawford and Jones.

Ogilvy is a stiff. Not worth any pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments about Crawford are ludicrious. Crawford and Jones will both be better players than Meeks. Meeks could shoot the ball (needed better accuracy), but his defense and handle was much worse than both Crawford and Jones.</p>
<p>Ogilvy is a stiff. Not worth any pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
