Bucksketball Podcast

Milwaukee’s new Creators

| June 24, 2011

Category: The Off Season

Share

The Milwaukee Bucks had a lot of trouble scoring in the 2010-11 season. That’s not news to anybody. But how do you get a team to score more points? Typically teams struggle getting stops and they bring in a defensive guru or something along those lines. Maybe they’ll make a couple of minor personell changes, but defense is often a mindset that has to be preached from top down. You don’t see too many teams rewiring their guys to turn them into scorers. Scoring is fun. No one heads outside to do defensive slides and work on getting to the help line.

In theory, it seems like the Bucks would have an easier time this off-season improving on offense than a team that needs the same type of drastic help on the other end of the court. But figuring out just where to start was an issue leading up to the draft. One of the arguements for the number ten pick involved scooping up Klay Thompson because of his shooting prowess. Many thought, if a team needs offense, they should add more shooters. Simple.

But that’s not where the Bucks organization saw its team as most flawed. The team made that very clear with both its moves and explanations for them on draft day.

“If you really dissect our offensive woes,” said Scott Skiles when meeting with the media after the draft, “our inability to make, first of all, the easy pass and then the more difficult passes … Stephen Jackson’s always been able to put the ball on the floor and make plays. Beno’s (Udrih) been able to do that, Shaun Livingston has great vision. So those three guys create offense for other people and draw attention.”

It was a significant lack of shot creation last season that put an incredible burden on Brandon Jennings and really exposed Milwaukee offensively. Once Carlos Delfino went down early in the season, Milwaukee was left with very one dimensional offensive players like Corey Maggette, at times Luc Mbah a Moute (especially early in the season) and a woeful John Salmons carrying the burden on the wings. None of them were able to create much for themselves, let alone for their teammates.

Maggette went to the hole with his head down looking for contact or a pull-up jumper from the elbow, but rarely had an interest in drawing and kicking. Mbah a Moute’s ball handling and lack of jump-shot leave him virtually useless except as a mid-range spot-up shooter on offense and the mysterious absence of any athleticism in John Salmons game had him forcing up contest shots in traffic halfway through the paint, but rarely at the rim. Things weren’t pretty. Milwaukee’s shooting numbers plummeted inside the arc and they had no one to bail them out from deep with Delfino out and Ersan Ilyasova suddenly a sub 30% three-point shooter.

Shooting was not the biggest issue here, it was what was happening before those deep shots were going up that was the real problem.

“One of the areas (we wanted to improve) is our ability around the rim,” Skiles said. “It put so much pressure on our perimeter shooting, our inability to finish. And both of those guys (Jackson and Udrih) are finishing type players. And the numbers show that. We always kind of come back to, if we shoot a higher percentage around the rim, get some dunks, get some easy baskets a lot of other teams get, then you don’t have a tendency to overreact to a missed three.”

Of course, it only matters what guys can do if they are healthy, happy and ready to play. There’s been some discrepancy on whether or not that’s the case with Jackson. ESPN reported that Jackson was less than enthused about being on the move once again.

A source told ESPN The Magazine’s Ric Bucher that Jackson is not happy about being dealt to Milwaukee and it remains to be seen how cooperative he’ll be if and when he joins the team.

But the Bucks think Jackson will be just fine once he gets adjusted to having been traded again. John Hammond noted the shock of being a top scorer who has been traded may have influenced any negative thoughts Jackson initially had.

“It’s our responsibility to make him comfortable, and we’ll do that. I’m sure it’s not easy for anyone at any time (to be traded),” Hammond said. “I don’t know that I’ve ever heard of any player that was the leading scorer on his team, that played, I think, 2500 minutes, ever got traded and said, ‘I’m happy.’ Most guys aren’t happy when they are traded.”

Skiles added that he had been in touch with Jackson.

“I spoke to Stephen, I was in Phoenix when we drafted him, I was an assistant coach, so I’ve known him a long time,” said Skiles. “We had a great talk. I don’t think it’s fair to always think because somebody tweets something it’s necessarily true. Or goes on TV and reports it. We want all our guys to be comfortable.”

“He’s a competitor and I don’t anticipate any problems at all.”

Stephen Jackson: The solution, not the problem. We’ll see how this one shakes out.

Jeremy Schmidt writes the Milwaukee Bucks blog Bucksketball.com. Follow him on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

Tags: , , , ,

About the Author ()

Jeremy Schmidt writes the Milwaukee Bucks blog Bucksketball. He founded it in January of 2009 because he hated his job. It’s like basketball, but with Bucks instead of basket. I know ... I’m sorry. He might come off as a bit negative, but I'm really not so bad. He just wants the Bucks to succeed, so he points out areas where they are coming up short. Someone has got to do it and he's ornery and opinionated enough to take on that task. He isn't sure if this should be in third person or not. Contact him at Jeremy@Bucksketball.com if you must use e-mail.

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Matt says:

    I love it.

    Unloading John Salmons god awful contract? Check.
    Unloading Corey Maggette’s god awful self? Check.
    Acquiring a guy that can create his own shot while still playing within a team’s offense? Check.
    Acquiring a good PG to play a Luke Ridnour role on our team? Check.
    Drafting a young SG or SF with a strong work ethic and a lot of potential/athleticism? Check.

    The Bucks did just about everything I could have dreamed of them doing this offseason just yesterday alone. I couldn’t be any happier. We’re speeding up the rebuilding process while actually getting better at the same time. The only thing we didn’t check off my off-season check list is a backup center, and with our plethora of PFs, I think we can use Gooden or Sanders at the center position to limit Bogut’s minutes some.

  2. Marq says:

    I’d still like to see a more adequate backup center than Jon Brockman. The guy worked hard and did everything expected of him, but we need a guy that won’t be vastly undersized and offensively inept every night. Maybe we already have that guy on our team if the frontcort corps can stay relatively healthy this year.

    On a different topic, is Ersan Ilyasova a Buck in name only at this point? I’ll miss the guy.

  3. Dave says:

    +1 for that. I’m really tired of having power forwards play our back-up Center position. We have one (injury prone) center and six power forwards? Can we move three power forwards for a back-up SG and back-up C? What value could we get for Ersan, Sanders, and Brockness?

  4. Jeremy Schmidt says:

    @Marq
    Hammond said he’s not necessarily done adding pieces. He said he’s always looking to put the best team out there he can. I assume he realized backup center is a weakness right now and could be addressed.

  5. Pete says:

    For the love of Pete, trade, move, or just plain cut Brockman.

  6. Senior Cabinet says:

    Its funny, I was thinkingthat I would like Beno at trade time last year…..

    Finding someone to take Salmons and Magette (even though Salmons should have a good bounce back year) was AMAZING

    1. Jennings/Livingston/.
    2. Jackson/Udrich
    3. Delfino/Mbah/Harris.
    4. Gooden/Ilyasova/Sanders
    5. Bogut/ Brockness

    Just get another back up centre to block shots and rebound (shoot occassionally) and were done (Spencer Hawes?)