By: Bryson

Bryson — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:12:01 +0000

I wouldn’t break down Burks and Thompson as an athleticism versus skills and polish argument. I think you’re selling Burks’ playmaking and ballhandling skills short. They’re actually better than Thompson’s. While Thompson has the edge in point guard skills over Hamilton, Burks has it over him. He’s one of the best playmakers and ballhandlers in this draft. Thompson’s a really good passer off picks but as his athleticism is only so-so and his handle could use some tightening up, it’s remain to be seen how much of a playmaking threat he’ll be at the next level.

Thompson’s a much better shooter than Burks, whose shot besides free throw shooting needs a lot of work. That’s what gives me pause. He’s an above average athlete and very fluid but not so explosive that it’s a given he’s going to be a dynamic and high-percentage finisher around the rim. He’s going to need a good, reliable jumper to be an above-average scorer.

If I had to choose between the two, I’d take Burks. If he can improve his jumper, he has the diverse skillset and athleticism to be a borderline all-star player. With Thompson, I’m not sure he’s a starter on a championship contending team. As a SF, he lacks power and as a 2-guard, he might be too slow.

By: Ted

Ted — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:19:59 +0000

I vote for Burks, you can improve shooting for easier than athleticism. Once you are a certain age there is only so much you can do to improve athleticism. Burks developing an outside shot is more likely than Thompson becoming more of a slasher

Comments on: The Klay Thompson and Alec Burks difference for the Milwaukee Bucks

By: Bryson

By: Ted