Bucksketball Podcast

Breaking down late: Bobcats 102 – Bucks 98

| November 20, 2012

Category: Recaps

Share
Milwaukee Bucks 98 FinalRecap | Box Score 102 Charlotte Bobcats
Ersan Ilyasova, SF 16 MIN | 2-5 FG | 0-0 FT | 4 REB | 1 AST | 4 PTS | -4

Sometimes I see people complaining about Ersan’s minutes. Do these individuals only check the minute section of box scores? Ilyasova is often doing zero effective things when he’s been on the court this season. Of course he’s going to play fewer minutes. Guys like Sanders, Dalembert and Udoh have been considerably more productive when they’ve played. Produce or sit. That’s pretty much where the Bucks front court is at.

Tobias Harris, SF 12 MIN | 1-2 FG | 1-2 FT | 3 REB | 0 AST | 3 PTS | +5

Very invisible night. The most notable thing I saw from him was a missed box out where Kidd-Gilchrist looked about a thousand times more aggressive and athletic than him grabbing an offensive rebound. Harris’ rebounding is pretty much equal to Udoh’s rebounding. Yikes.

Monta Ellis, PG 42 MIN | 14-28 FG | 2-2 FT | 3 REB | 5 AST | 31 PTS | -13

Very Ellis. He can be so elusive going to the hoop that it seems like sometimes it makes it impossible for the defense to foul him. He had a number of drives where he split defenders and finished without any contact it all. It was kind of amazing. It’s hard to pin much of this one on Ellis, though his three on the final possession, open as it might have been, probably wasn’t the move to make.Unlike the Boston game, he couldn’t get hot down the stretch (1-for-6 in the final nine minutes). Couple that with the Bucks inability to get stops when they were most needed again and Milwaukee was doomed.

Brandon Jennings, PG 33 MIN | 5-18 FG | 0-0 FT | 4 REB | 5 AST | 10 PTS | -14

People talk about Jennings defense and use words like gamble a lot, but I think the worst thing he did defensively came when he gave a very soft double on Byron Mullens that left Ramon Sessions wide open for a three late in the fourth. Sessions isn’t known as a 3-point shooter, but left completely alone, he can do it. And what’s the benefit of soft doubling Mullens? He wasn’t in position to make a play on either guy and it hurt bad.I have a lot more coming on Jennings’ offense. I started typing it here, then things came pouring out and this box exploded. Stay tuned. In summation, if the only consistent thing about Jennings’ season is me saying he needs to be consistent, that’s a bummer.

John Henson, PF 15 MIN | 3-7 FG | 0-0 FT | 3 REB | 0 AST | 6 PTS | +4

He got the first “important’ minutes of his career, when he checked in with nine minutes to play in the fourth. He didn’t look overwhelmed, he looked aware of where he was supposed to be for the most part. I don’t know about that 3-point attempt with 4:13 top lay though. Very questionable shot

Mike Dunleavy, SF 36 MIN | 6-10 FG | 3-4 FT | 5 REB | 4 AST | 16 PTS | -9

Very disappointing not to see Dunleavy get a touch on the Bucks last possession. He stood in a corner while Ellis ran a pick and roll and then attempted an open three. This was shortly after Milwaukee ran their typical set up three with 3:14 to play that got Dunleavy an open jumper from the left side. It probably would have been tough to get space with that action on the final possession, but surely there was more that could have been done to involve the team’s best shooter.

Larry Sanders, C 21 MIN | 3-5 FG | 0-0 FT | 3 REB | 2 AST | 6 PTS | -14

Sanders’ active hands hurt the Bucks under two minutes. Fighting for a rebound after a missed John Henson layup, he fouled Michael Kidd-Gilchrist 80 feet from the basket in the bonus, sending him to the line for two. One possession later, he reached in as Kemba Walker was coming off a pick and roll and apparently made too much contact, sending Walker to the line. Acouple of tough plays, the sort of plays that happen to guys who are pretty active with their hands. Just bad timing that it led to four easy points late in a very tight game.

Three Things We Saw

  1. The free throw differential, Charlotte was 27-30 and Milwaukee was 8-11, was significant. Were the Bucks getting hosed? When it mattered late, there were probably two questionable calls that went against the Bucks, the Mullens post-up that led to throws and a Sessions drive where a block was called on Dunleavy, but for the most part, Charlotte was drawing way more contact on their trips to the hoop and Milwaukee did themselves in with some reaching fouls in the last two minutes.
  2. The 3-point shooting that bailed Milwaukee out against the Hornets was absent Monday night. The Bucks were just 2-for-16 from behind the arc. Ellis was 1-for-5 and Jennings 0-for-4. Meanwhile, Beno Udrih once again failed to attempt a three. He very rarely pulls the trigger, but wouldn’t we all feel more comfortable if he was the one attempting five threes and not Ellis? It’s strange.
  3. The Bucks squeaked by the Cavs and Hornets, but decisively beat both the Sixers and Pacers. Very strange. It’s hard to get a good feel for this team at this point. I know the win-loss record, 6-3, is very solid, but the lack of big time wins over some weaker opponents is disappointing. Perhaps I’m viewing the Bobcats through last season’s lens, but it’s hard to imagine them as a legitimate playoff team, early season success notwithstanding.An 11-point lead in the final 7:26 to play in the game was a big opportunity for the Bucks to get five games above .500 before a very tough four game run against the Heat, Bulls, Bulls and Knicks and they failed. But Milwaukee’s shown they can at least compete with Boston. Now we’ll see how they fare against the rest of the heavyweights in the East over the next nine days.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

About the Author ()

Jeremy Schmidt writes the Milwaukee Bucks blog Bucksketball. He founded it in January of 2009 because he hated his job. It’s like basketball, but with Bucks instead of basket. I know ... I’m sorry. He might come off as a bit negative, but I'm really not so bad. He just wants the Bucks to succeed, so he points out areas where they are coming up short. Someone has got to do it and he's ornery and opinionated enough to take on that task. He isn't sure if this should be in third person or not. Contact him at Jeremy@Bucksketball.com if you must use e-mail.

Comments (14)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Ted says:

    I think the best way to describe Monta Ellis is “Frustratingly Entertaining” I can see now after a few months of watching him play why Golden State fans were so fond of him

    • sillybilly says:

      It was a great game from Monta up until the end when he started to play hero ball. Otherwise he worked pretty well within the flow of the offense. Its easily observable that this team plays better (back-ups and starters) when movement on the offensive end increases. You could see it when Beno, Mike, Udoh, Lamb, and Henson made a run in the second. Jellings are at times just as guilty of stopping the offensive flow as they are of creating it.
      Luckily its something that can be changed so hopefully that happens.

  2. Justin says:

    Must be nice to make the two play that possibly cost us the game and still get a C.. I’m gonna go broken record here and say “Larry.. stop F’ing swiping”.. Kemba Walker is listed at a very generous 6-feet tall.. L.S.(now an acronym for Lover of Swiping) has a substantial 9’4″ standing reach.. any shot in that situation should be a difficult one, but here comes the bailout.. don’t know how Skiles doesn’t develop ulcers on plays like those.. Anyways Larry stay active, stay tall, and I will stay positive

  3. John Proctor says:

    I think it’s worth mentioning for Henson’s part that the Bobcats clearly exploited him by feeding Byron Mullins late in the game, which cost us big time. Dalembert should have been in there or Sanders should have taken Mullins.

  4. The Bucks have themselves to blame for Ilyasova’s poor performance. to start off the front office gambled signing a non-prototypical power forward to a five year 40$ million deal. Ersan is not a back to the basket player as he gets most of his offense from the perimeter. If he does not make his shots, then he is essentially useless on the offensive end.

    It does not help that the Bucks have a starting backcourt that essentially dominates the ball. Both Jennings and Ellis play mostly from the perimeter not allowing proper spacing for Ilyasova to use his strengths offensively by spreading the defense. Since there is no real post presence for the Bucks, defenses just hover around the perimeter waiting for a bricked jump shot by Milwaukee.

    • Patti says:

      Actually, I think Ersan is great at the rim, putting back offensive rebounds. Part of his struggle is that he’s not playing under the rim as he should. Last year he played with Gooden, who probably was out around the perimeter allowing Ersan to get better position. Now we have a couple of others that are playing center position in the paint. It’s a team adjustment and hopefully it will come together for everyone. Too soon to write him off, but putting in the guys getting it done is okay with me.

      When the Bucks are playing well and moving the ball, they are getting inside. They may throw up a bricked jump shot, but I think they are doing much more than that. It was a bad finish and there was plenty of blame to go around.

    • sillybilly says:

      “If he does not make his shots, then he is essentially useless on the offensive end”

      hmmmm well he is a good passer, a good rebounder, sets good screens, and unless he continues to shoot 25% for months defenders will have to follow him to the perimeter so he spreads the floor. So yea,you’re wrong.

  5. sillybilly says:

    Yuck, what an awful finish.

    The bad news is we could have played a lot better.
    The good news is we could have played a lot better.

    This team has a lot of potential, and it amazes me how our bench is seemingly better than our starters on a given night. I haven’t decided if this is good or bad yet.

    • Matthew says:

      Yeah! I challenge just about anyone to show me a team with a better bench. I still laugh at the fact that Doc Rivers before the season began said, “The Bucks will be a team that I won’t look forward to facing (paraphrasing a little)” and we beat them up good the first game of the year!

      I kinda wonder if Scott Skiles is paying Drew Gooden not to play or if he’s just fallen that far down the depth. Maybe a trade in the works to whoever wants to take on a large contract?

      • Patti says:

        Yeah, is Drew that bad in practice or does Skiles think his personality allows other young players to get play time while not damaging the psyche of Drew & Joel.

        It’s a long season and injuries on our team or some other team may change the future of Drew. His $6M is not a bad contract and shouldn’t be a huge factor either way.