Archive

Author Archive

The backup center turned starting center who really isn’t a center

April 17th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 21 comments

Gooden was overwhelmed by Hibbert on Saturday. (Photo by Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Images)

Andrew Bogut played in 65 games last season, but in the other 17 Milwaukee cobbled together starting lineups that included Jon Brockman, Larry Sanders or Drew Gooden in the center position.

Since Bogut’s injury and then eventual trade, Gooden’s assumed the majority of the center minutes this season. When he’s been out, Milwaukee’s been forced into some tougher positions again, using Sanders, Ekpe Udoh and even at times Ersan Ilyasova at the five.

So yeah, the Milwaukee Bucks lack size inside.

Flirtations over the past two seasons with Erick Dampier, Joel Przybilla and Kyrylo Fesenko haven’t result in the backup, and probably now starting, center Milwaukee’s seemed to need. But speaking with reporters before a recent game, Scott Skiles made it sound like the Bucks got all the backup big they wanted when Gooden was signed.

“One of the primary reasons of signing Drew was to be the backup five to Bouges,” Skiles said. “Not that he wouldn’t also start at the four, we didn’t rule that out or anything. We thought because he’s done it before, that in a pinch, he could swing to the backup five and pick and pop and shoot the ball like he has and things like that.

“This year it’s just worked out that that has been his primary role. That’s just what’s happened. Drew is a four/five, he’s not a five/four. But for us right now he’s a five. Strictly a five.”

Gooden hasn’t rebounded as well this year as he has previously in his career – the 6.4 rebounds per game he’s averaging would be his lowest season total of his career – possibly because he’s dealing with a different kind of player defensively.

To his credit, Gooden has responded with one of his more productive seasons offensively. At times he’s been consistent with a mid-range jumper shot that’s helped open things up offensive for the Bucks. His assist rate of 16.3% his more than twice his career rate of 7.6%. Plus, he’s admirably fought for position and ground defensively with the league’s largest players all season.

Read more…

Size-less Bucks lose sizable game: Pacers 105 – Bucks 99

April 14th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 10 comments

Indiana Pacers 105 Final
Recap | Box Score
99 Milwaukee Bucks
Ersan Ilyasova, PF 21 MIN | 4-8 FG | 2-2 FT | 4 REB | 0 AST | 11 PTS | +4

His minutes have been a bit limited lately, seemingly due to some match-up issues. But at what point do match-ups become less of an issue and does it become a priority to get one of the Bucks better players on the court whenever possible. His size seems to be his biggest limitation from him ever taking another step forward. West and Hibbert were both far too big for him to be as effective as he can be on the glass.

Drew Gooden, PF 26 MIN | 2-10 FG | 3-4 FT | 8 REB | 0 AST | 7 PTS | -7

He was unable to recapture Friday night’s magic. The jumpers did not fall. Against the Pistons, he was 9-13 from 16-23 feet. The Bucks would have loved to see such accuracy against Hibbert so he’d have to come out and contest and quit grabbing boards inside. He ceded his minutes to Sanders in the fourth.

Monta Ellis, SG 38 MIN | 8-18 FG | 2-2 FT | 5 REB | 4 AST | 20 PTS | -2

This game was there for the taking throughout the second half of the fourth quarter. From 4:00 to 1:14 left in the fourth, Milwaukee trailed 99-96. Ellis attempted, and missed, one shot during that stretch. So much for the guy who was going to carry the Bucks at the end of games.

Brandon Jennings, PG 45 MIN | 6-19 FG | 2-2 FT | 8 REB | 10 AST | 16 PTS | -7

The numbers look fun at first glance. A near triple-double! Let’s go! But Jennings was 0-5 with a turnover in the fourth quarter. Not exactly prepping for a sequel to Reggie Miller’s documentary “Winning Time.”

Mike Dunleavy, SF 22 MIN | 5-8 FG | 1-4 FT | 8 REB | 0 AST | 13 PTS | 0

He looked like he wanted to take things over in the fourth. He took three of the Bucks first four shots and attempted a pair of free throws. Crazy thing was, he missed both free throws. And he missed a tech free throw earlier. 1-4 at the stripe for Mike Dunleavy?! Crazy night. But he did a good job of going to get rebounds outside of his space throughout the fourth quarter.

Ekpe Udoh, PF 14 MIN | 2-3 FG | 0-0 FT | 0 REB | 1 AST | 4 PTS | -10

Udoh has good ability as a defender, but if he’s going to be a good rotation player on a good team he has to be a better rebounder. He played center for 14 minutes and failed to grab one rebound. Meanwhile the Pacers starting front line combined for nine offensive boards.

Larry Sanders, C 25 MIN | 3-3 FG | 2-6 FT | 6 REB | 2 AST | 8 PTS | -1

What a very Larry Sanders game. He was actually okay and looked pretty in control of himself, of the game, of a lot of things. But things kind of got away from him late. He racked up a couple fouls and he caught a pass on the top of the key and took everyone on an adventure. He first carried, it wasn’t called, then he eventually made a pass into the tunnel under the hoop. But he lasted 25 minutes, so there’s that.

Three Things We Saw

  1. Skiles was not thrilled with Ilyasova’s contested 3-pointer with the Bucks down three late in the fourth quarter. He didn’t want to single Ilyasova out, as he saw a number of poorly executed plays by the team throughout the game. That’s the problem he says the Bucks have. They are unable to come down, execute a play and finish it off. Maybe it’s a lack of practice or repetition, but whatever it is, we see it by the boat load game in and game out.
  2. Oh the free throws. 16-26 for the game and 0-5 in the fourth quarter. That is not the way to close out a game during a playoff push.
  3. Milwaukee now sits two and a half games back from the Sixers for the eighth seed.

Owning pessimism – Why it doesn’t make you a bad person

April 13th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 14 comments

As my Milwaukee Bucks world came crashing down around me earlier this week I found myself, as I often do, looking to Twitter and Facebook for some sort of kinship. I don’t know what I was looking for. I guess I wanted to see other people complaining about the Bucks. I wanted to see people frustrated about what was going on.

My search ended almost as quickly as it began.

I saw almost nothing.

I did see the occasional person compliment Milwaukee on its effort. Then I saw someone in my Facebook timeline had a picture from the Knicks game with a caption of something like, “Got last minute tickets to the Bucks game.” The first comment was about no one ever actually making a plan to go to a Bucks game. The second was something more simple, like the Bucks suck. I shook my head, rolled my eyes and moved on to Twitter where some people were feeling the same way I was.

All the national writers and bloggers I follow had little to nothing to say about the ramifications of the Bucks-Knicks game though. A few comments about the Knicks probably securing a playoff spot and about the Bucks having their work cut out for them the rest of the way were made. Matt Moore had a bunch of funny tweets throughout the night. But after the game was done on Wednesday, the biggest regular season game the Bucks have had a couple years mind you, pretty much no one was talking about the Bucks.

That’s our reality right now. I was incredibly charged and full of a variety of thoughts from “I TOLD EVERYONE SO” to “Can it get any worse?” to “Maybe Monta Ellis can work.” But only a few hundred people really cared.

No one ever really cares. The Bucks do not matter. And that’s why I am the way I am. That’s why I write the way I write.

Read more…

Life support: Knicks 111 – Bucks 107

April 11th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 20 comments

New York Knicks 111 Final

Recap | Box Score

107 Milwaukee Bucks
Carlos Delfino, SF 22 MIN | 1-3 FG | 0-1 FT | 4 REB | 1 AST | 2 PTS | -17

If there’s one thing Delfino has always done well as a Buck, it’s get inside Carmelo Anthony’s head. For whatever reason, the Knicks star doesn’t seem to like Milwaukee’s role playing forward. As he often has done, he drew a tech on Anthony in the fourth. Unfortunately, he was getting lit up by Anthony before that and failed to make any impact on offense. And Milwaukee missed the free throw. So that’s a bummer.

Ersan Ilyasova, PF 14 MIN | 1-3 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 0 AST | 3 PTS | -3

Coach Skiles said he thought Ilyasova looked really anxious. He threw away an easy pass across the court and had some foul trouble early. This isn’t a great match up for him. Does he play center and deal with Chandler? Or the power forward and guard ‘Melo? Tough spot.

Drew Gooden, PF 5 MIN | 0-1 FG | 0-0 FT | 0 REB | 0 AST | 0 PTS | -5

Gooden played just five minutes, largely due to an injured back that’s left him looking kind of like a shell of his former self.

Monta Ellis, SG 41 MIN | 14-25 FG | 4-5 FT | 6 REB | 10 AST | 35 PTS | -8

The game of Ellis’ Bucks career for sure. He passed well out of the pick and roll, shot well on his spot up threes and finished on his drives to the hoops. His mid-range jumper was going down too. Defensively some of his gambles paid off, but he was beat on some really simple drives at times and on J.R. Smith’s eventual game winning three, he went so far over the top that no one could recover out on Smith (H/T @DrewOlsonMKE). But he carried the Bucks through the first half, so there’s that.

Brandon Jennings, PG 41 MIN | 10-20 FG | 0-1 FT | 4 REB | 7 AST | 22 PTS | -13

He and Ellis both played very well and made some big shots, timely shots. But on the Bucks final worthwhile possession, down three with nine seconds left, he let fire on a broken play. The look wasn’t great – a 3-pointer over Tyson Chandler’s seven-foot arm. Ellis didn’t seem thrilled about what happend, but Milwaukee needed to do something. If Jennings could have worked to get it back to Ellis somehow we don’t know.

Mike Dunleavy, SF 36 MIN | 5-15 FG | 7-8 FT | 6 REB | 3 AST | 19 PTS | +7

A typical of late Dunleavy shooting night and the Bucks probably take this one down. He had a great look with 43 seconds remaining that would have put the Bucks up three and probably would have gone down on another night. After grabbing his own offensive rebound, he got another look and was either blocked or altered by Carmelo Anthony. A bummer of a way to shoot given how automatic he’s been lately.

Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, SF 32 MIN | 3-7 FG | 2-5 FT | 8 REB | 1 AST | 8 PTS | +12

Someone had to absorb Carmelo’s body blows in the fourth. His defense was solid, and the help was generally pretty good. ‘Melo scored seven points in the fourth quarter, two of which came after a Mbah a Moute block that hit off the backboard and fell back into Anthony’s hands for a layup. The easiest of Anthony’s looks came at the hand of Delfino. Mbah a Moute was physical with him and picked him up full court when Anthony went all point forward.

Minus one grade for the hideous jump shot attempt from 15-feet in the fourth quarter that barely, if at all, drew rim on the long side.

Ekpe Udoh, PF 23 MIN | 3-4 FG | 2-4 FT | 5 REB | 0 AST | 8 PTS | -14

He found himself so open around the free throw line with the ball in his hand at one point early in the fourth quarter that he had no choice but to shoot. Possibly to his surprise, he made the shot, his second bucket in the fourth. That little bit of offense was icing on the cake of another fine defensive outing from the undersized center, forced to cover a lot of Drew Gooden’s five minutes.

Larry Sanders, C 12 MIN | 2-2 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 0 AST | 4 PTS | +10

I tweeted at one point that this may have been Sanders’ best game ever. That was too much. My bad. He had a very good game. Sanders battled admirably with Tyson Chandler inside and even gave him a hard foul at one point much to the delight of the crowd. Sanders is playing with more edge recently, which is fun and necessary out of a backup big man. He also had two electric blocks that led to fast breaks.

Four Things We Saw

  1. Milwaukee needed to capitalize on opportunities if they were going to win. But they failed too many times to do so. A missed free throw by Jennings after a technical from Carmelo. Loose balls scattered across the ground after stops and tapped out rebounds they couldn’t recover.The missed free throw from Jennings looks big now. Instead of up nine, the Bucks were up eight. Two possessions later it was a three point game and the Knicks were ready to take advantage.
  2. Milwaukee got some bounces its way in the fourth. Between two minutes and 23 second left in the fourth, the Bucks grabbed offensive rebonds on three straight possessions. On two of them, they grabbed two offensive boards. The first possession resulted in a three from Monta Ellis. The second resulted in more missed shots and the eventual start of the end. Coach Skiles opted against calling a timeout, citing the team’s struggles in executing out of timeouts lately. He said he was pleased with the shots (a pair from Mike Dunleavy), but they just didn’t go down.
  3. In the first quarter, the Knicks made 14 of 15 shots in the paint and shot 77% as a team. The Bucks had no defensive presence inside, especially with the hobbled Drew Gooden handling the first few minutes. Chandler exposed his immobility for seven quick points and the Bucks couldn’t stop the bleeding until the quarter ended. Once again, they had to dig out of a whole.
  4. Milwaukee now sits two games back of the Knicks for the eighth seed and three back of Philadelphia for the seventh. They’ve also lost their tiebreaker with the Knicks.

Opportunity is pounding at the door, but will the Bucks answer?

April 11th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 3 comments

The Thunder were too strong for the Bucks Monday night. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps)

Who doesn’t like a story?

The thing about stories is that they have logic. They start somewhere, something happens and then it’s resolved one way or the other. It’s a wonderful thing, progression.

Maybe that’s what drives me so crazy about this Bucks team.

In 2009-10, the Bucks started the season beating bad teams at home and sticking with good teams at home. Then they started beating a few bad teams on the road. Then the good teams at home. And then, finally, the good teams on the road. You could see the progression, not just in their wins, but in their play too.

But the Bucks lost that logical progression over the past two seasons. Wins that people would generally like to classify as big have often been followed by let downs. A win at home over Miami earlier this season looked like it would be a jumping off point for some great things. Two nights later, the team lost in Detroit. Then turmoil surrounded the team’s handling of Stephen Jackson, Brandon Jennings numbers plummeted back down to Earth as we all tried to figure out why he stopped shooting and/or caring, and the Bucks couldn’t find ways to win.

Then the schedule lightened up and Milwaukee looked like world beaters again. So we know they’re better than bad, but we still don’t know just where the ceiling is. Obviously this team isn’t a title contender, but are they a legitimate playoff team? When things matter the most, are they going to be able to do things right for 48 minutes?

Consistency is what makes a team worth watching.

Read more…