Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Andrew Bogut’

There are no stupid questions about Milwaukee’s 97-92 loss to the Hawks

January 23rd, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 19 comments
Atlanta Hawks 97 Final

Recap | Box Score

92 Milwaukee Bucks
Andrew Bogut, C 25 MIN | 3-10 FG | 0-0 FT | 12 REB | 4 AST | 6 PTS | 0

Offensively, Bogut isn’t where he wants to be, he isn’t where the Bucks want him to be and he isn’t where Scott Skiles wants him to be. Skiles was asked about Bogut after the game and he said he thought Bogut struggled tonight. Asked if he was concerned this far into the season that Bogut hasn’t been able to find his touch on his post-up moves and Skiles said, “A little bit.”

Take that for what you will. The center’s absence late in the game did little to increase Skiles’ popularity in southeast Wisconsin.

Brandon Jennings, PG 40 MIN | 9-22 FG | 0-0 FT | 5 REB | 11 AST | 21 PTS | -2

It can’t be all 30 point games and it can’t be all 5-20 nights for Jennings. There has to be some kind of middle. Monday night was just a little better of the middle. He shot a decent percentage, but most importantly, he was in attack mode all night and was finding teammates regularly. Jennings detractors often point to his low assist totals as a sign he’s not much of a real point guard. They didn’t have much to point to Monday.

Stephen Jackson, SG 28 MIN | 0-1 FG | 0-0 FT | 1 REB | 2 AST | 0 PTS | -1

Maybe he was tired of hearing everyone complain about his shot-selection or his ball holding or whatever else we’ve all been complaining so much about. Whatever the reason, Jackson took just one shot on Monday night, which was a fair amount of unbelievable. It wasn’t like he wasn’t playing hard – he drew a particularly nice charge on Joe Johnson in the fourth quarter. It was strange to see him so uninvolved with the offense though. He just moved the ball quick and went on his way while Jennings, Gooden and Dunleavy did the heavy lifting in the fourth quarter. Very un-Jacksonlike. He’s a man who could stand some balance in his game now that we’ve seen both extremes.

He said after the game that shots didn’t come tonight and that his role was no different. He went as far as to say a question about whether or not his role was different tonight was dumb. For the record, this is the first game in Jackson’s career that he’s played at least 25 minutes and attempted one or fewer shots. Seemed like a relevant question.

Drew Gooden, PF 23 MIN | 4-10 FG | 4-5 FT | 6 REB | 2 AST | 13 PTS | -5

Gooden is so many things. Ridiculous. Polished. Aggressive. Complacent. Clever. Foolish. He’s all these things at once. It makes for a maddeningly frustrating player to watch and it was curious that he played so much of the fourth quarter. Yes, he has the ability to make a shot and his drives to the basket do often result in the free throws that Bogut never draws, but he’s just so damn all over the place. Despite the okay numbers, he had some costly defensive three second violations in the fourth. But hey, somehow he hit a three to tie it with a minute to go.

I give up.

Mike Dunleavy, SF 31 MIN | 6-15 FG | 5-5 FT | 3 REB | 1 AST | 17 PTS | +2

Dunleavy still didn’t hit a three. So he decided he could be useful in other ways. Instead of coming off screens behind the arc, he curled in an extra step and shot twos. His form is terrific, spin unreal and release the same every single time. But really, he needs to start making some threes too. A good time to start would have been the one he missed with Milwaukee down three and no one within five feet of him with 30 seconds to play. Also he turned it over on Milwaukee’s last important possession. Sigh.

Ersan Ilyasova, PF 28 MIN | 3-7 FG | 4-7 FT | 11 REB | 0 AST | 10 PTS | -1

Ilyasova is very, very tough. He has to be leading the Bucks, if not the league in one handed rebounds that were tipped away from two or three other defenders. Jon Leuer has lost some playing time, a lot of playing time, lately, but be sure that Ilyasova is earning his share of what were Leuer’s minutes.

Two Things We Saw

  1. The fourth quarter was a back and forth battle. Milwaukee needed stops on a number of occasions and Joe Johnson had really been getting into them. Yet still, no Luc Mbah a Moute and no Andrew Bogut. Very curious. Milwaukee had to double team Johnson late just to try and contain him and it led to two passes and a wide-open three from Josh Smith that pretty much sealed the game, given Milwaukee’s three-point shooting struggles. That a bad defensive rotation came with Bogut and Mbah a Moute on the bench left fans on Twitter pretty furious.
  2. Joe Johnson reminded us in Milwaukee once again that it’s very nice to have a superstar late in games. And if that star is 6-foot-8 and can handle the ball, it’s all the better. Johnson was giving Milwaukee fits late in the game, and while Jackson did his best, he simply didn’t have the athleticism to keep Johnson from getting into positions where he could make shots.

The Bucks are playing defense again so here’s an old WWF commercial

January 23rd, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt No comments

The Bucks tag team of Bogut and Mbah a Moute: “Twice the mayhem!”

It’s easy to credit Andrew Bogut with the success of the Bucks defense. In the way that we give quarterbacks or point guards credit for wins, we often attribute the success of an NBA team’s defense to its center. He’s the quarterback of the defense. Maybe he’s like the middle linebacker then. If that’s the case, Bogut has been the Bucks version of Ray Lewis over the past two seasons.

When healthy, he’s blocked shots, rotated and taken charges as well as any center in the league not named Dwight Howard. There are numbers to back that up too. We see the big block numbers and the impressive charge totals and we can see that he’s doing things very few centers in the league do very plainly.

The numbers don’t paint such a clear picture when it comes to Luc Mbah a Moute.

He doesn’t have big block or steal numbers. He’s more like a corner back that doesn’t get thrown at. Those guys don’t pile up interception totals, but the guy they were covering all game ended up with just two catches for 17 yards.  There isn’t a statistical category that makes it plain for us to see how much Mbah a Moute matters, so he doesn’t get quite as much credit for Milwaukee’s defensive success over the past few seasons, even if he is acknowledged across the league as a standout perimeter defender. The perimeter defender is viewed as a one-on-one stopper, not as someone who brings his teammates to a higher level defensively.

But that Bogut and Mbah a Moute tag team absolutely drags everyone on the Bucks up a couple of notches on the defensive side.

Read more…

The word unlikely isn’t quite enough to describe this win: Bucks 91- Heat 82

January 22nd, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 3 comments
Milwaukee Bucks 91 Final

Recap | Box Score

82 Miami Heat
Shaun Livingston, PG 39 MIN | 3-7 FG | 4-4 FT | 5 REB | 5 AST | 10 PTS | +11

One of Livingston’s biggest assets is his size, not only because it lets him post up smaller players on offense, but because Milwaukee can easily switch with him and virtually anyone else on pick and rolls. Against the Heat, with James and Chalmers and Cole and Battier all involved in the pick and roll game, it was useful to have Livingston able to defend any of them. He had another strong, multi-faceted offensive game doing a little scoring, dishing and rebounding.

Andrew Bogut, C 32 MIN | 5-8 FG | 3-4 FT | 8 REB | 2 AST | 13 PTS | +1

Bogut’s offense is still touch and go. It’s difficult to project when he’ll play well and when he’ll be leaving hook shots a foot short. But with Luc Richard Mbah a Moute back, Milwaukee certainly looks to have their defensive tag team ready to regain the belt. The Bucks held Miami to their lowest scoring game of the season and Bogut played a huge role in that.

Brandon Jennings, PG 35 MIN | 5-20 FG | 12-13 FT | 6 REB | 6 AST | 23 PTS | +9

Jennings wasn’t getting the same looks against Heat point guards Mario Chalmers and Norris Cole that he was getting against Iman Shumpert and Mike Bibby of the Knicks. Miami was forcing him to take more shots in the in-between area, not as many three-point looks and not as many looks in the paint. Jennings struggled to hit what three-point looks he did get, but he did his best to keep penetrating and keep feeding his teammates. He even chipped in on the glass, with no rebound being bigger than the one he grabbed late in the fourth quarter and put back in to basically ended the game.

Stephen Jackson, SG 26 MIN | 4-13 FG | 0-0 FT | 4 REB | 1 AST | 10 PTS | +12

Jackson did not start for the second straight game, but he did play in this one. He started slow, but hit two big threes, one late in the third quarter and one to start the fourth. He’s a gambler on D and he was able to poke the ball out while helping on defense on a couple of occasions as well. He looked to pass and had a couple of pretty assists too.

Jackson isn’t a lost cause, even if people have been writing him off after his latest mishap. He still has the talent to be a useful player, as he demonstrated against the Heat. And most importantly, this isn’t a guy who has quit on his teammates or anything like that. He’s still a competitor, and he’s still competing.

Ersan Ilyasova, PF 22 MIN | 5-8 FG | 5-5 FT | 6 REB | 0 AST | 16 PTS | +7

Ilyasova came in quick for Jon Leuer and made it difficult for Scott Skiles to take him back out. He was terrific on the glass and from a competitive standpoint. This was a classic Ilyasova game, right down to the made three-pointer. It makes sense that in an ugly game, Ilyasova was one of the players to shine.

Four Things We Saw

  1. The Heat must have been aware of the Bucks failures as an outside shooting team. They went zone for the last three minutes of the game and gave the Bucks plenty of trouble. Milwaukee couldn’t knock down the shots they were getting from the outside, but some good ball movement from the Bucks created open looks inside.
  2. Mbah a Moute and Delfino split time on Lebron James and they did what every team hopes to do: They made things difficult for him. Of course, James still had 28 points and 13 rebounds. What a monster.
  3. Milwaukee mad just 5-30 threes, which doesn’t seem like a sustainable formula for success. Of course, when they defend this well, there’s a pretty large margin for error. Mike Dunleavy was unable to find it from three in his second game back and Jennings struggled badly from deep. But this is probably a little better three-point shooting team than this game would have you believe, simply because those two won’t always shoot that bad.
  4. Two straight road wins for Milwaukee, one against a bad team and one against a monster team. One with Stephen Jackson and one without him. What have we learned? We still have a lot to learn about this Bucks team. They are still figuring out who they are and still getting to where they want to be defensively. But rarely have the Bucks been able to pull out such a big road win over the past few seasons. This was encouraging, even if the Heat were on a back-to-back.

Run and gun and not so fun: Nuggets 105 – Bucks 95

January 17th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 3 comments
Denver Nuggets 105 Final

Recap | Box Score

95 Milwaukee Bucks
Stephen Jackson, SG 17 MIN | 0-6 FG | 2-2 FT | 0 REB | 1 AST | 2 PTS | -20

Holy hell. It’s tough to say Collapsin’ Jackson’s season has been a roller coaster ride. It’s been more like that episode of The Simpsons where Homer is getting airlifted from the bottom of the gorge, and he gets up and then falls back down and then they keep hitting his head on the side of the cliff as they bring him up. That’s been Jackson’s season thus far. He fell back down tonight right about when Scott Skiles opted against playing him in the second half.

Jon Leuer, F 18 MIN | 4-6 FG | 3-3 FT | 1 REB | 1 AST | 11 PTS | -8

Leuer still did well the same things he always does well against the Nuggets. He hit a couple open shots, finished around the rim and found open space on offense. He can’t make enough of a difference by himself to matter all that much in most games though. In spurs, sure, but Leuer making smart plays alone certainly isn’t enough for the Bucks. Like most Bucks, he’s a role player. He’s just better at it.

Andrew Bogut, C 19 MIN | 1-5 FG | 0-0 FT | 5 REB | 2 AST | 2 PTS | -17

This probably wasn’t how Andrew Bogut envisioned following up his 20 and 11 effort in Philadelphia. The saga continues.

Brandon Jennings, PG 38 MIN | 13-22 FG | 1-2 FT | 3 REB | 6 AST | 30 PTS | -11

It’s almost heart breaking to see the various pained looks Jennings wears on his face throughout a game like this. He wants to succeed so bad and when the Nuggets beat his teammates backdoor or bust out while four other Milwaukee defenders stand flat-footed after yet another miss, Jennings looks defeated. It certainly isn’t him giving up either.

I can’t say that I blame him and I can’t say it seems like he’s being a bad teammates. Competitiveness isn’t something you can fake and it isn’t something you can turn off. It’s always on with Jennings kudos are well deserved for him for his second half effort (21 points, 12 in the fourth quarter).

Tobias Harris, F 27 MIN | 5-10 FG | 4-4 FT | 8 REB | 3 AST | 14 PTS | +13

Chubby appearance be damned, Harris was running the floor and playing well Tuesday night. Brandon Jennings is often looking to run, but it’s not often he finds anyone running with him. Harris may have lost a pound or two in sweat on Tuesday simply by trying his best to keep up with Jennings. Better yet, Harris looked effective in the half court as well. His constant attacking efforts should serve him well … so long as no one ever steps up to take a charge on him. The eight rebounds and three assists were nice too, as sometimes it’s looked like Harris is a bit one dimensional. Defensively, he does look to have some work to do.

Three Things We Saw

  1. Oh my god Nuggets fast breaks and bust outs on makes and misses. The fast break points (Milwaukee actually won the battle 23-18) don’t even tell the tale. The Nuggets ran off makes better than any team since the 2005 Suns. Someone is always busting out, then setting up in the corner. Fast breaks and three-pointers galore were the Nuggets on Tuesday.
  2. Each of the Bucks that spoke after the game and Coach Scott Skiles all referenced the team’s awareness that the Nuggets liked to run. Everyone knew it was coming and they still couldn’t stop it. That says something abut the Nuggets skill. They aren’t the league’s fastest team and sixth best offense for no reason. But it also says something about Milwaukee’s focus and lack of attention to even some basic details like getting back to stop transition.Skiles said something we often forget after games like this: “They are humans.” Some times, human beings keep making the same mistakes, especially when they are overmatched.
  3. Jackson didn’t play in the second half. His thoughts?: “If they want to blame it on somebody I’ll take the blame. It is what it is. I guess they expected me to spaz out and go crazy. Too late in the game for that. I don’t know what they was trying to prove. Hopefully they proved the point, whatever they was trying to prove.” More on this later. Don’t get too bothered in the meantime.

There is a lot riding on Stephen Jackson’s creaky back

January 17th, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 1 comment

We may be just 12 games into the new season, but it sure feels like the Milwaukee Bucks are heading down the same road they traveled last season. A road plagued with stop signs, red lights and crosswalks. It was never a smooth drive for the Bucks last season en route to the NBA’s worst offense.

So far, the Bucks have sputtered along with the league’s sixth worst offense. We’ve seen the same offensive droughts and shooting troubles. We’ve seen turnovers. We’ve seen inaccurate shooting from deep. We’ve seen a lot.

Occasionally though, there have been signs of life. There is reason to be hopeful that they’ll find a detour away from those offensive potholes that tripped them up last season.

To be frank, sometimes Stephen Jackson has been good and Milwaukee’s offense largely relies on that happening more frequently than it has.

Jackson, along with Shaun Livingston and Beno Udrih, was acquired over the summer to provide Milwaukee with another playmaker. The Bucks wanted more players around point guard Brandon Jennings that could create easy looks in an offense that largely left the Bucks with difficult jump shots last season.

The early return on Jackson this season has fallen in line with the return on the rest of the Bucks. He’s looked old, he’s looked slow and he often looked selfish. That’s just a description of Jackson’s road games though. At home, like the rest of the Bucks, he’s been a different player.

At home, Jackson has shot 48%. He’s averaging 20.5 points and five assists per game. Perhaps most importantly, he’s made 38% of his threes too.

On the road, Jackson has shot 32%. He’s averaging 11.8 points and 2.9 assists per game. Perhaps most importantly, he’s made just 26% of his threes.

The Bucks are 4-0 at home this season and 0-8 on the road.

Read more…