<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; David Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bucksketball.com/tag/david-lee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bucksketball.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:51:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>English</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bogut A Headache for the Knicks: Bucks 83 &#8211; Knicks 67</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/bogut-a-headache-for-the-knicks-bucks-83-knicks-67/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/bogut-a-headache-for-the-knicks-bucks-83-knicks-67/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ersan Ilyasova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Salmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy McGrady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap/Box Score
Thankfully, Andrew Bogut was able to avoid a migraine Monday night.  That appears to have been the only thing that can stop him when he plays the Knicks.
Bogut thought he was on his way to a career night when the Bucks made their first trip to Madison  Square Garden earlier this month.  He [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=300222018" target="_blank">Recap</a>/<a href="http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=300222018">Box Score</a></p>
<p>Thankfully, Andrew Bogut was able to avoid a migraine Monday night.  That appears to have been the only thing that can stop him when he plays the Knicks.</p>
<p>Bogut thought he was on his way to a career night when the Bucks made their first trip to Madison  Square Garden earlier this month.  He began that evening with six points and three rebounds in five minutes before he could no longer bare the bright lights and big city of New   York thanks to a migraine headache.  The headaches occasionally leave Bogut feeling numb he says and are certainly nothing he play through.</p>
<p>The Knicks defense on the other hand?  Well he just plays right through them.</p>
<p>The Knicks, who play without a center, played like a team … that doesn’t have a center.  Bogut was able to get whatever he wanted inside when the Knicks weren’t rushing in with an immediate double team.  <strong>David Lee </strong>is a very good power forward, but at roughly 6’9 he had no answer for the 7’0 Bogut down low.  When Bogut wasn’t getting shots, he was hitting the glass on both ends to further frustrate Lee – the same David Lee that was picked over him as an injury replacement for the all-star game.  Correlation?  I’m sure the Aussie will downplay it, but do you know anyone who, if matched up with them, wouldn’t want to perform better than someone who earned a promotion they thought was rightfully theirs?</p>
<p>In the fourth quarter with the Knicks getting handled but hanging on to hope a comeback may be within reach, Bogut climbed over Lee’s back to tip in a shot.  Bogut was whistled for the foul and Lee furiously clapped his hands together and nodded in approval.  His cup had runneth over with frustration.  Can you blame him though?  Bogut would end the night with 24/20 and five blocks.  If I was guarding him, I’d be frustrated too.<span id="more-1242"></span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Offense</span></h2>
<p>While the two teams combined to shot just 22 free-throws (14 for the Knicks and eight for the Bucks) that doesn’t mean the Bucks were afraid to get in the paint.  Milwaukee outscored New York 50-34 on points in the paint and, through Bogut, asserted their will inside all night.  With the way the Bucks were shooting it from deep, 4-18, it was important that they kept finding Bogut and getting good looks.  Bogut ended the evening 12-15 from the field.</p>
<ul>
<li>Another      game, another dagger.  Okay, so this      one wasn’t a dramatic game winner or a breakaway steal.  And the game wasn’t really very close      when he hit the shot.  But still, <strong>John Salmons</strong> hit a three to push      the Bucks lead to 12 with three minutes to go that, for all intensive      purposes, ended the game.  It was      actually Salmons’ only three of the evening, as he didn’t have much of a      night (7-18 FG, 1-7 3FG and 15 points).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Ersan Ilyasova </strong>had a career night      when Bogut went down earlier this month in the Big Apple and performed      well Monday night too.  On a tidy      5-8 from the field, Ersan scored 10 points and pulled down six boards.</li>
</ul>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Defense</span></h2>
<p>Let’s just hold off on declaring <strong>Tracy McGrady </strong>“back” just yet.  Bucks fans have seen this movie before.  The once dominant scoring shooting-guard comes back and has a big game.  Then he has a game that isn’t as good and you notice him start to grab his knee and wince a little.  Next, I predict he’ll miss Tuesday’s game against Boston.  Then he’ll come back and have a few mediocre games and the Knicks will say he needs a week or two off.  Then he’ll either come back for good or be shelved pending further evaluation.  Either way, you’re just getting started on this roller coaster Knick fans.  Of course, I could be wrong and T-Mac really could just have had some soreness attributed to not playing for a while.  Either way it could be worse.</p>
<p>He could have another season left at $18 million.  Sigh.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Luc Richard Mbah a Moute </strong>drew      McGrady duty for most of the evening and did his usual fine work.  After a fast start, eight points in the      first quarter, McGrady rarely had much going the rest of the way.  T-Mac’s famed passing skill produced      only one assist, but that kind of thing happens when a guy’s team shoots      less than 40 percent.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>This      was the perfect storm of a good defensive team playing a bad offensive      team trying to adjust to some new faces in the picture.  At least I think that’s what it      was.  It sure makes the whole thing      a little more explainable.  I mean, there      has to be some explanation as to how the Knicks were held to a season low 67      points on 33.8 percent shooting.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Lee      may remember fondly upon his 30/15 line from February 6, but this 12 and      13 evening won’t be one for the books.       The easy shots he was getting inside against a slower <strong>Kurt Thomas </strong>and a smaller <strong>Ilyasova </strong>were nowhere to be      found with Bogut constantly lurking.</li>
</ul>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Final Thoughts</span></h2>
<p>Three games into the John Salmons Era and things are looking pretty good for the Bucks.</p>
<p>Of course, the three games are ones the Bucks would have expected to win two weeks ago too, so it may be a bit premature to get too excited.  But a little excitement here and there can be a good thing right?  The Bucks have won nine of their last 12 games and four in a row on the road as they creep up on .500 in February.  The last time the Bucks were over .500 this late in the season?  2005-06 – or the last time the Bucks made the playoffs.</p>
<p>Get (a little) excited.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/bogut-a-headache-for-the-knicks-bucks-83-knicks-67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Not Necessary: Bucks 114 &#8211; Knicks 107</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/defense-not-necessary-bucks-114-knicks-107/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/defense-not-necessary-bucks-114-knicks-107/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Delfino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hakim Warrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike D'Antoni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott SKiles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Box Score/Recap
New York’s basketball team isn’t typically apart of my basketball viewing schedule.  They aren’t on national television very often and when they are I tend to look the other way.  I’m not big on teams that have gutted their roster in order to pursue free agents.    While I generally liked Mike D’Antoni’s Suns teams, [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore/_/id/300205018/milwaukee-bucks-vs-new-york-knicks" target="_blank">Box Score</a>/<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap/_/id/300205018/milwaukee-bucks-vs-new-york-knicks" target="_blank">Recap</a></p>
<div id="attachment_1167" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1167" src="http://bucksketball.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Hak-Dunk-200x300.jpg" alt="(Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images) Hak' = Dunk" width="200" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">(Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images) Hak&#39; = Dunk</p></div>
<p>New York’s basketball team isn’t typically apart of my basketball viewing schedule.  They aren’t on national television very often and when they are I tend to look the other way.  I’m not big on teams that have gutted their roster in order to pursue free agents.    While I generally liked <strong>Mike D’Antoni’s </strong>Suns teams, I know the Knicks can’t be as efficient, mainly because they have few shooters and even less competent point guards.  Plus they play even less defense than those Suns teams did.  There’s a word that I can’t think of right now that would describe them aptly I assumed, but I had little proof since I never watched them.  But I had high hopes for the Bucks on Friday night coming into their game on Broadway.</p>
<p>Then Andrew <strong>Bogut</strong> got hurt.  So I went from hopeful that the Bucks would be able to leave the Big Apple with a win, to downtrodden that Bogut’s injury might be more than a migraine.  My thought process went something like this:</p>
<p>Migraine?  What?  He’s never had migraines before.  Didn’t he just take a charge a minute or two ago?  Is this another back injury?  Will we see Bogut again this season?  Is his career in jeopardy?</p>
<p>So that may have been an overreaction.  Call me a little snake bit after years of injury problems that seem to never end and spread across the roster.  Bogut walked out fine, no limp, no slouch, no teammates dragging his body to the locker room, so I’ll operate going forward under the assumption that all is well.  As for Friday night’s game, I thought of the word I was looking for and it isn’t even very fancy.  Simply put, the Knicks are defenseless.<span id="more-1164"></span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Offense</span></h2>
<p>There was lots and lots of offense in this one, specifically from <strong>Brandon Jennings</strong>, though little of it came early in the game.  A 1-9 start probably was predictable given the circumstances coming into this game – the often inaccurate Jennings’ first trip to the big city of New York, a team that passed on him quite famously now.  What was unpredictable though, and delightful actually, was the way Jennings would rebound after the poor start.  With Bogut out, Jennings took a very active role in the offense and finished the game hitting seven of his next 14 shots.  8-23 won’t change a lot of the opinions on Jennings’ abilities offensively, but those wins the Bucks keep getting might.  Jennings finished the game with 22 points and eight assists against just two turnovers.  That’ll do.</p>
<ul>
<li>There      would have been lots of “<em>Turkish      Thunder” </em>chants out of Squad Six had this game happened at the Bradley Center, because <strong>Ersan Ilyasova </strong>subbed in      wonderfully for Andrew Bogut.  25      points and nine rebounds on a very shiny 10-18 shooting line.  Ersa Major hit two of his three      three-point attempts and even made a free-throw near the end of the      game!  He was his typical pesky      self, tipping balls and drawing charges in other facets of the game, the      biggest difference was that he was just making his open shots.  It’s just that simple.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Hakim Warrick</strong>: Dunks.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The      ever-giving New York      defense allowed the Bucks to shoot 47.8 percent and 41.7 percent on three’s.  <strong>Charlie      Bell </strong>was 3-4, <strong>Carlos Delfino </strong>was      2-6 and Jennings      was 2-7.  Delfino’s line was      particularly dazzling, as he tossed in nine rebounds, six assists and      three steals on top of his 13 points.       Team efforts win games for the Bucks, especially with Bogut out.</li>
</ul>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Defense</span></h2>
<p>I’m not going to lie; I can’t see <strong>David Lee </strong>as an all-star.  32 points and 15 rebounds look terrific, but every Buck and their mom was getting baskets inside.  The Bucks shot 62.9 percent at the rim Friday which was considerably better than the 45 percent they shot on Tuesday in Orlando.  A lot of Orlando’s success had to do with the all-star they had playing defense inside.  A lot of New York’s struggles are their system and generally lack of effort on defense, but some of it is David Lee being a non-factor taking charges or blocking shots.  Granted, he’s probably a power forward playing center, so I shouldn’t toss all the blame on him, but he’s got to do a little more on defense if he ever wants to get to the next level.</p>
<ul>
<li>Without      Bogut, the Bucks weren’t able to force as many turnovers as they’d like,      but this game was more about who could score more efficiently anyway.  The key to the Bucks defense Friday was      doing their best to sloppy up the Knicks already helter-skelter attack and      run out at shooters.  They held the      Knicks to a worse shooting percentage then they shot themselves and that’s      a great way to beat the Knicks.</li>
</ul>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Final Thoughts</span></h2>
<p>A winning road trip for the Milwaukee Bucks, what a novel concept.  Yes, the road trip was three games and one was in Miami and another in New York, but road wins are road wins.  The Bucks may not have that signature road win <strong>Scott Skiles </strong>has been looking for, but, sitting just a game back of Miami for the eighth seed with the tiebreaker in hand the Bucks can feel pretty good coming home today.  With Indiana awaiting them at the Bradley  Center on Brandon Jennings bobblehead night, the easily scheduled month of February still looks promising for the Bucks.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/defense-not-necessary-bucks-114-knicks-107/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game 48 Preview: Bucks at Knicks</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/game-48-preview-bucks-at-knicks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/game-48-preview-bucks-at-knicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Harrington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Duhon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Chandler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Milwaukee Bucks (Scott Skiles) 21-26
Inactives: Francisco Elson, Joe Alexander and Mike Redd
at
New York Knicks (Mike D&#8217;antoni) 19-29
Inactives: Eddy Curry, Cuttino Mobley and Darko Milicic
Date: 2/5/2010
Time: 6:30 (CST)
TV: FS Wisconsin
Matchups
Point Guard
Brandon Jennings vs. Nate Robinson
I guess Mike D’antoni wanted to spare the world the Brandon Jennings/Chris Duhon “who will miss more shots” matchup.  Robinson is taking [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;">Milwaukee Bucks (Scott Skiles) 21-26</span></h2>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Inactives:</strong> Francisco Elson, Joe Alexander and Mike Redd</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>at</strong></p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;">New York Knicks (Mike D&#8217;antoni) 19-29</span></h2>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Inactives:</strong> Eddy Curry, Cuttino Mobley and Darko Milicic</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Date:</strong> 2/5/2010</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Time:</strong> 6:30 (CST)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>TV:</strong> FS Wisconsin</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;">Matchups</span></h2>
<p align="center"><em>Point Guard</em></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Brandon Jennings vs. Nate Robinson</strong></p>
<p align="center">I guess Mike D’antoni wanted to spare the world the Brandon Jennings/Chris Duhon “who will miss more shots” matchup.  Robinson is taking over at the point guard spot beginning Friday, which is bad timing for Milwaukee.  If Duhon wasn’t the worst starting point guard in the league, he wasn’t far from the bottom.  I know Jennings has struggled shooting the ball for the majority of this year, but at least he’s young, what’s Duhon’s excuse?  Duhon and Jennings both shot 32 percent from the field in January, a frigid shooting percentage for a frigid month.  Robinson is electric offensively, but didn’t play for 14 straight games earlier this year, for no other reason than D’Antoni wasn’t feeling him.  He’s less of a point guard and more of a scorer, but he excels at that.</p>
<p align="center">Advantage: Bucks<span id="more-1162"></span></p>
<p align="center"><em>Shooting Guard</em></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Charlie Bell vs. Wilson Chandler</strong></p>
<p align="center">Another long, athletic, slashing shooting guard for Charlie Bell to work on after <strong>Vince Carter </strong>gave him fits in Orlando.  Every year, Chandler has taken a couple more shots at the rim each game and every year he gets a little better as a player.  The more he uses his incredible athleticism to his advantage, the better he’ll be in the league.  His three-point shooting has gone from average to not very good at all, so the less he’s shooting anything other than wide open shots the more opportunities he’ll give himself for success.  Chandler seems more like a small forward playing the two guard spot, if they could find a good shooter to put next to him he may be even better.</p>
<p align="center">Advantage: Knicks</p>
<p align="center">
<p align="center"><em>Small Forward</em></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Carlos Delfino vs. Jared Jeffries</strong></p>
<p align="center">A lengthy defender who can do a lot of things on defense and roughly zero things on offense, Jeffries goal Friday will likely be nothing more than to give Delfino problems.  When Delfino has been on lately, the Bucks have been pretty tough to beat.  In recent losses to Toronto and Orlando, Delfino couldn’t find his shot and the rest of the Bucks followed suit.  Delfino is one of few Bucks that can get to the rim and is in an even more exclusive group of Bucks that can finish when they get there.  Jeffries length may give Delfino some problems in getting open looks outside, so he’ll have to be ready to shoot right when he catches.</p>
<p align="center">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p align="center">
<p align="center"><em>Power Forward</em></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Luc Richard Mbah a Moute vs. Danilo Gallinari</strong></p>
<p align="center">Gallinari is probably shooting a three right now.  <strong>David Thorpe, </strong>when talking about the shooting prowess of <strong>Stephen Curry, </strong>recently said that he thought Curry might make the most three’s in this decade, though he conceded he’d have to vie for that crown with Gallinari.  Gallinari is 6’10.  As stretchy a four as stretch four’s can be is Gallinari, but that doesn’t make him a bad matchup for the Bucks.  Mbah a Moute can hang with most players outside and Gallinari is no different a case.  Unfortunately, the Bucks can’t go to Mbah a Moute to try and expose “The Rooster” defensively, as Mbah a Moute isn’t very good at all on offense.</p>
<p align="center">Advantage: Knicks</p>
<p align="center"><em>Center</em></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Andrew Bogut vs. David Lee</strong></p>
<p align="center">Ah, here’s what we’ve been waiting to see.  One all-star snub vs. another, with Bogut, the classic back down big man, against Lee, the burgeoning point-center who can put it on the floor, lay it for someone else, or dunk it himself.  Both of them are among the best rebounders in the league, racking up double-doubles on a near nightly basis.  Bogut has a quickness advantage over lots of centers in the league, but not Lee.  Lee is ultra-quick and can explode for dunks.  Each should pose a different set of problems for the other defensively, though Bogut is a much better overall defender than Lee, who chooses not to participate on that end very often.  I’m sure each has heard the other’s name mentioned a lot with regard to all-star candidacy, so it’ll be interesting to see how they react as they should be more than up for this challenge.  Fortunately for the Bucks, Bogut’s had two days off since Orlando, which always increases the odds he’ll do well.</p>
<p align="center">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p align="center"><em>Bench</em></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Luke Ridnour, Kurt Thomas, Ersan Ilyasova, Hakim Warrick and Jerry Stackhouse</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Vs.<br />
</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Al Harrington, Larry Hughes, Toney Douglas, Jonathan Bender and Chris Duhon</strong></p>
<p align="center">Harrington is one of those guys who comes in and gets buckets immediately.  He’s capable of a 40-point showing off the bench and not many guys are capable of that.  If he gets hot from three, he’ll fire without remorse regardless of whether or not it’s a good shot.  Hughes has been in Mike D’antoni’s bizarre revolving door doghouse lately and in response has grown quite the beard of defiance.  He got some run against the Wizards though and with Chris Duhon not being very good, we’ll see where this goes.  Duhon might play, he might not play, it’s tough to tell how far he’s been demoted.  If he doesn’t play, Toney Douglas or Jonahtan Bender may be in line for more run.</p>
<p align="center">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;">Prediction: Bucks 107 – Knicks 97</span></h2>
<p>With two days off after the loss in Orlando, the Bucks are in prime position to steal another one on the road in New York.  The Knicks last played Wednesday, so they’ve had time to rest as well, but they don’t really have an answer for a healthy and rested Andrew Bogut underneath.  The Bucks would be well advised to pound it in to him every chance they get and try to get the Knicks down early.  Offensively the Knicks can come back from an early deficit, but they don’t exactly have the most mental toughness out there.  When the Bucks were able to jump on them early in Milwaukee in November, the Knicks pretty much folded up shop and gave in.  That’s the kind of effort the Bucks will be looking to get out of them again.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/02/game-48-preview-bucks-at-knicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Five Preview: Bucks vs. Knicks</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/11/game-five-preview-bucks-vs-knicks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/11/game-five-preview-bucks-vs-knicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Duhon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danilo Gallinari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilson Chandler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match-Ups
Point Guard
Brandon Jennings vs. Chris Duhon
The Knicks give 16 more points per 100 possessions when Duhon is on the court.  They score 98 and allow 114 with him per every 100 possessions.  Duhon&#8217;s PER is 10.5.  The league average is 15.  Duhon is 6-29 on three point shots this year.  Duhon was scoreless in 39 [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Match-Ups</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Point Guard</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Brandon Jennings vs. Chris Duhon</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">The Knicks give 16 more points per 100 possessions when Duhon is on the court.  They score 98 and allow 114 with him per every 100 possessions.  Duhon&#8217;s PER is 10.5.  The league average is 15.  Duhon is 6-29 on three point shots this year.  Duhon was scoreless in 39 minutes against the Cavaliers on Friday night.  Duhon is making $6 million this year and prevented the Knicks from really making a run at <strong>Allen Iverson </strong>or <strong>Ramon Sessions</strong> on one or two year deals at below market value for either player.  Do I need to say anymore for you to know who has the edge in this match-up?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks<span id="more-684"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Shooting Guard</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Charlie Bell vs. Larry Hughes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">In his prime, Larry Hughes was a terror in the passing lanes on defense and a slashing guard that could finish at the rim and handle the ball like a point guard on offense.  Capable of 20 points and two or three steals a night, Hughes in his prime was the prototypical big point/two guard.  Hughes is no longer in his prime.  Hughes has never been an especially strong shooter.  At this point Hughes is probably as average a starting shooting guard as there is in the league.  Fortunately for Larry Hughes, Charlie Bell is a below average starting shooting guard and one with limited size.  Hughes should be able to exploit his match-up with Bell and cheat in the passing lanes and get a good jump in the Knicks transition game.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Knicks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Small Forward</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Carlos Delfino vs. Wilson Chandler</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">I could have sworn Wilson Chandler was really good, I was certain of it.  That&#8217;s what the <strong>D&#8217;Antoni </strong>system can do for you.  Chandler is having an even worse season when comparing offensive and defensive ratings than Duhon.  He&#8217;s -19!  He was better last year at -7, but was still negative and had a PER of 12.9.  The Knicks are just one average player after the next.  This is the team that wants to get <strong>Lebron James? </strong>Keep dreaming.  I know at some point Chandler has been mentioned as one of the building blocks they&#8217;re using to lure James.  Wilson Chandler isn&#8217;t going to get that done folks.  Chandler is a poor three point shooter, but has some upside as a rebounding small forward.  He&#8217;s like a slightly worse shooting more athletic version of Delfino, but without the occasional ball handling skill.  I know you&#8217;re as unimpressed as I am.  And now I&#8217;m certain Chandler will put up 35 and torch the Bucks from all over because A. that&#8217;s what happens when I say anyone isn&#8217;t good and B. that kind of thing can happen any night with anyone in this system.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Power Forward</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Hakim Warrick vs. Danilo Gallinari</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Gallinari matches up at the power forward spot, but he&#8217;s about as far from a traditional power forward as possible.  Gallinari is putting up 9.4 three pointers a game and hitting at 42.6%!  Mike D&#8217;Antoni has called him the best shooter he&#8217;s ever seen and others call him &#8220;The Rooster&#8221;.  To Hakim Warrick I say this, call him whatever you want, just don&#8217;t leave him open in transition, because he will burn you with the three point shot.  Of all the Knick starters, he worries me the most.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Knicks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Center</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Andrew Bogut vs. David Lee</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Lee is probably grabbing a rebound right now.  Lee&#8217;s a walking double double in this system.  Hell, he was a double digit rebounder before D&#8217;Antoni came around.  Lee is crazy athletic and has a motor that never stops.  Lee is exactly the type of power forward I would love to see the Bucks get eventually to pair up with Brandon Jennings.  Problem for Lee right now is that he&#8217;s playing center and a center he is not.  In the half court Bogut should give him all kinds of problems, but he&#8217;s without question a superior athlete and will beat Bogut up and down in transition.  It&#8217;s imperative that Bogut keep Lee off the offensive boards.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Bench</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Jodie Meeks, Luke Ridnour, Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, Ersan Ilyasova and Dan Gadzuric</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>vs.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Al Harrington, Darko Milicic, Jared Jeffries and Tony Douglas</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">The Bucks went ten deep on Friday with no player logging more than 30 minutes.  Skiles likes to play match-ups, so expect to see Dan Gadzuric get minutes as the Bucks try and stay with New York&#8217;s thoroughbreds.  Jodie Meeks also may get significant minutes again after settling down in the second half Friday.  The Knicks leading scorer is Harrington, who has been coming off the bench since game three where he put up over 40.  Harrington has made a living shooting the three and playing little defense, but is shooting more free throws than ever before this year at nearly eight a game (his career average is 3.3 per game).  Harrington may be able to exploit that against the Bucks, but the rest of the Knicks bench offers little in the way of offense or defense.</p>
<h2>Prediction: Bucks 95-Knicks 88</h2>
<p>95 points constitutes a shootout for this season&#8217;s Bucks team.  Milwaukee has broke 90 only once this year, but may have to if they want to beat the fast paced Knicks.  The Knicks lead the league in three point attempts, but only are connecting (stats as of before Friday night&#8217;s game) at a 28.5% clip.  That&#8217;s not the recipe for success.  Scott Skiles will be glad to offer a cursory challenge of the Knicks wild threes, as long as they don&#8217;t bring it inside and aren&#8217;t grabbing rebounds.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/11/game-five-preview-bucks-vs-knicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

