Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Joe Johnson’

There are no stupid questions about Milwaukee’s 97-92 loss to the Hawks

January 23rd, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 19 comments
Atlanta Hawks 97 Final

Recap | Box Score

92 Milwaukee Bucks
Andrew Bogut, C 25 MIN | 3-10 FG | 0-0 FT | 12 REB | 4 AST | 6 PTS | 0

Offensively, Bogut isn’t where he wants to be, he isn’t where the Bucks want him to be and he isn’t where Scott Skiles wants him to be. Skiles was asked about Bogut after the game and he said he thought Bogut struggled tonight. Asked if he was concerned this far into the season that Bogut hasn’t been able to find his touch on his post-up moves and Skiles said, “A little bit.”

Take that for what you will. The center’s absence late in the game did little to increase Skiles’ popularity in southeast Wisconsin.

Brandon Jennings, PG 40 MIN | 9-22 FG | 0-0 FT | 5 REB | 11 AST | 21 PTS | -2

It can’t be all 30 point games and it can’t be all 5-20 nights for Jennings. There has to be some kind of middle. Monday night was just a little better of the middle. He shot a decent percentage, but most importantly, he was in attack mode all night and was finding teammates regularly. Jennings detractors often point to his low assist totals as a sign he’s not much of a real point guard. They didn’t have much to point to Monday.

Stephen Jackson, SG 28 MIN | 0-1 FG | 0-0 FT | 1 REB | 2 AST | 0 PTS | -1

Maybe he was tired of hearing everyone complain about his shot-selection or his ball holding or whatever else we’ve all been complaining so much about. Whatever the reason, Jackson took just one shot on Monday night, which was a fair amount of unbelievable. It wasn’t like he wasn’t playing hard – he drew a particularly nice charge on Joe Johnson in the fourth quarter. It was strange to see him so uninvolved with the offense though. He just moved the ball quick and went on his way while Jennings, Gooden and Dunleavy did the heavy lifting in the fourth quarter. Very un-Jacksonlike. He’s a man who could stand some balance in his game now that we’ve seen both extremes.

He said after the game that shots didn’t come tonight and that his role was no different. He went as far as to say a question about whether or not his role was different tonight was dumb. For the record, this is the first game in Jackson’s career that he’s played at least 25 minutes and attempted one or fewer shots. Seemed like a relevant question.

Drew Gooden, PF 23 MIN | 4-10 FG | 4-5 FT | 6 REB | 2 AST | 13 PTS | -5

Gooden is so many things. Ridiculous. Polished. Aggressive. Complacent. Clever. Foolish. He’s all these things at once. It makes for a maddeningly frustrating player to watch and it was curious that he played so much of the fourth quarter. Yes, he has the ability to make a shot and his drives to the basket do often result in the free throws that Bogut never draws, but he’s just so damn all over the place. Despite the okay numbers, he had some costly defensive three second violations in the fourth. But hey, somehow he hit a three to tie it with a minute to go.

I give up.

Mike Dunleavy, SF 31 MIN | 6-15 FG | 5-5 FT | 3 REB | 1 AST | 17 PTS | +2

Dunleavy still didn’t hit a three. So he decided he could be useful in other ways. Instead of coming off screens behind the arc, he curled in an extra step and shot twos. His form is terrific, spin unreal and release the same every single time. But really, he needs to start making some threes too. A good time to start would have been the one he missed with Milwaukee down three and no one within five feet of him with 30 seconds to play. Also he turned it over on Milwaukee’s last important possession. Sigh.

Ersan Ilyasova, PF 28 MIN | 3-7 FG | 4-7 FT | 11 REB | 0 AST | 10 PTS | -1

Ilyasova is very, very tough. He has to be leading the Bucks, if not the league in one handed rebounds that were tipped away from two or three other defenders. Jon Leuer has lost some playing time, a lot of playing time, lately, but be sure that Ilyasova is earning his share of what were Leuer’s minutes.

Two Things We Saw

  1. The fourth quarter was a back and forth battle. Milwaukee needed stops on a number of occasions and Joe Johnson had really been getting into them. Yet still, no Luc Mbah a Moute and no Andrew Bogut. Very curious. Milwaukee had to double team Johnson late just to try and contain him and it led to two passes and a wide-open three from Josh Smith that pretty much sealed the game, given Milwaukee’s three-point shooting struggles. That a bad defensive rotation came with Bogut and Mbah a Moute on the bench left fans on Twitter pretty furious.
  2. Joe Johnson reminded us in Milwaukee once again that it’s very nice to have a superstar late in games. And if that star is 6-foot-8 and can handle the ball, it’s all the better. Johnson was giving Milwaukee fits late in the game, and while Jackson did his best, he simply didn’t have the athleticism to keep Johnson from getting into positions where he could make shots.

History begs for low expectations at 10

May 19th, 2011 Jeremy Schmidt 3 comments

Don’t expect a superstar.

Those are my words of advice to anyone curious about who the Milwaukee Bucks will end up drafting with the 10 pick in just over a month.  In prepping my expectations for Milwaukee’s pick, I’ve gone through every draft since 2000 to try and get a feel for what becomes of the number 10 pick.  In the above chart, I measure performance of every guard or wing pick since 2000 by PER.  I’m sticking with guards and wings for now, as every indication seems to point to Milwaukee going after a two or three (or maybe a tweener four) with its first pick.

Read more…

Broken Bucks fall again: Hawks 110 – Bucks 85

March 16th, 2011 Jeremy Schmidt 1 comment

Recap/Box Score/Enemy

Every time the Milwaukee Bucks have summoned the strength to take a step forward this season the team has made sure to follow it up with two steps back.  After a three game winning streak heading into Sunday’s game against Boston, that’s kind of what losses to the Celtics and Atlanta Hawks over the past few days were.  Except these two losses didn’t feel like two regular steps back.

These losses felt more like two steps back into oncoming traffic.

After a 56-point effort that had people everywhere snickering and joke telling, Milwaukee was hoping to rebound with a momentum builder in Atlanta Tuesday night.  Instead, Milwaukee nearly played as poorly against the Hawks as the team did against the Celtics.  Milwaukee’s defense showed as little fight as its offense has all season in a 110-85 stomping.

Not that it was impossible to see another loss coming.  Since the calender flipped to 2011, Milwaukee has played 36 games, posting a 14-22 record.  When combing through the wins and losses, the story tells itself: Milwaukee generally beats bad teams and loses to good ones.

Wins over: Dallas, New Jersey (2), Washington (2), Cleveland (2), Atlanta, Toronto (2), LA Clippers, T-Wolves, Pistons and Sixers.

The last time Milwaukee beat a team with a winning percentage better than .500 was December 21, when Earl Boykins bailed them out against the Los Angeles Lakers.

This isn’t news to the Bucks.  After Tuesday’s game, Brandon Jennings told the Milwaukee-Journal Sentinel, “It doesn’t get any easier. Things are going to have to change pretty soon. We’re going to have to start beating some of the good teams, too.”

Lines like that have been common place during this season.  Things have had to change for some time and Milwaukee has had to make a run since forever, but signs of hope have been few and far between.  Four of Milwaukee’s next six games come against Orlando, New York and Chicago.  If they lose all four, at least Milwaukee’s fans can finally stop worrying about getting their collective hopes up anymore.

Read more…

It got hot in there: Bucks 98 – Hawks 90

January 26th, 2011 Jeremy Schmidt Comments off

Recap/Box Score/Enemy

If you only have been watching Bucks games this season, you’re certainly aware of the three-point shot, but you may not have known how quickly it can turn a game around.

Now you know.

The simple way to explain Milwaukee’s improbable comeback from down 11 points to begin the fourth quarter is like this: they got hot.  Hot enough to outscore the Atlanta Hawks by 19 points in the fourth quarter on their way to a 98-90 victory in Milwaukee Wednesday night.

It started with Carlos Delfino.  Having struggled miserably in his first three games back from injury, some were calling for reduced minutes, or at least reduced shots for Delfino.  At least until he started making shots again.  Things can turn quickly in basketball though and Delfino appeared to have found his form early Wednesday night.  Delfino had made two of four threes heading into the fourth quarter.  He then hit another on Milwaukee’s first possession of the fourth quarter to cut Atlanta’s lead to eight and by the time he made his third and final three in the period, he was putting the Bucks up five.

He didn’t do it all by himself though.

Former D-Leaguer Garrett Temple sprinkled in a pair of timely threes and Earl Boykins went on one of his patented shot-making sprees to key a Bucks offense that had been lifeless throughout the game.  Defensively the Bucks kept after the Hawks and Atlanta did little to put pressure back onto a surging Milwaukee team.  The Hawks had been moving the ball well enough to get good looks and got solid play inside from Al Horford for three quarters.  But when things fell apart in the fourth quarter, the team started relying on Josh Smith jump-shots to get them back into the game.  Predictably, that failed miserably.

And on every miss the Bucks had a little more energy and countered with the plays they needed to make.

Read more…

Game 43 Preview: Bucks vs. Hawks

January 26th, 2011 Jeremy Schmidt Comments off

Milwaukee BucksTeamCharlotte Bobcats
Scott SkilesCoachPaul Silas
29-43Record30-42
Ersan Ilyasova and
Chris Douglas-Roberts
Injuries/InactiveDeSegana Diop, Tyrus
Thomas and Joel
Przybilla
101.3Offensive Efficiency102.8
102.6Defensive Efficiency107.2
DateMarch 28, 2011
Time6:00 PM (CST)

Enemy: Hoopinion

Point Guard
Keyon Dooling vs. Mike Bibby

We’ve been over this a time or two.  Dooling: defense.  Bibby: offense.  Fortunately for Milwaukee, Dooling’s a better offensive player than Bibby is a defensive player.  Especially lately.  Dooling’s connected on 43.2% of his threes this month and 41.6% of his shots overall.  Injuries to Brandon Jennings and John Salmons have forced Dooling into a much bigger role over the past month and a half and for the most part, he’s responded well.  Defensively there are some players he matches up with better than others, but he’s always competitive at that end.  Earlier in the season his shooting was an adventure, but he’s normalized over the past month.  Dooling’s had plenty of criticism come his way this season, but he’s been more than adequate as Milwaukee’s number two point guard.

Advantage: Bucks

Read more…