<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Portland Trail Blazers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bucksketball.com/tag/portland-trail-blazers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bucksketball.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>English</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Game 26 Preview: Bucks at Blazers</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/12/game-26-preview-bucks-at-blazers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/12/game-26-preview-bucks-at-blazers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyon Dooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarcus Aldridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trail Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Matthews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=2459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enemy: Portland Roundball Society
Point Guard
Keyon Dooling vs. Andre Miller
For the first time in 107 games, the Milwaukee Bucks will not be starting Brandon Jennings.  Having hurt his foot/ankle on a hard fall against the Spurs in San Antonio, Jennings didn&#8217;t look like his normal self against the Jazz Saturday and revealed after the game that [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Enemy: </strong><a href="http://www.portlandroundballsociety.com/" target="_blank">Portland Roundball Society</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Point Guard<br />
</em><strong>Keyon Dooling vs. Andre Miller</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">For the first time in 107 games, the Milwaukee Bucks will not be starting Brandon Jennings.  Having hurt his foot/ankle on a hard fall against the Spurs in San Antonio, Jennings didn&#8217;t look like his normal self against the Jazz Saturday and revealed after the game that he in fact was not his normal self.  Dooling will get his second start of the season, and it&#8217;s probably coming at the right time for him.  Over his past five games Dooling has hit eight of 12 threes while averaging a respectable 8.4 points and 3.4 assists.  Miller is slow of foot &#8211; just ask <strong>Brandon Roy </strong>- but having a very strong season for Portland.  He still can&#8217;t shoot from outside, but he does everything else the Blazers need.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Advantage: </strong>Blazers<span id="more-2459"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Shooting Guard</em><br />
<strong>John Salmons vs. Wes Matthews</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">With Roy out with an injury, Matthews has received the bulk of the minutes at the two for Portland.  Matthews has a significant athleticism advantage over Salmons and when the Blazers visited Milwaukee earlier this season, showed off a nice touch from behind the arc.  Salmons looked like he was fitting in nicely next to new starting small forward CD-R last game, but collapsed down the stretch, shooting just one of six in the fourth quarter and generally forcing the issue like he&#8217;s done for so much of this season.  Milwaukee will need Salmons at his play making best without Jennings.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Advantage: </strong>Portland</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Small Forward<br />
</em><strong>Chris Douglas-Roberts vs. Rudy Fernandez</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Fernandez just wants to go home to Spain, and he&#8217;s been playing like it for most of the season, posting career low numbers across the board.  He responded to his insertion into the starting lineup for <strong>Nicolas Batum </strong>(injured) well last game though, scoring 15 points, dishing six assists and grabbing four rebounds.  He&#8217;s a versatile offensive player in the <strong>Carlos Delfino </strong>mold, but with more athleticism and less defensive prowess.  CD-R has looked good as a starter so far for Milwaukee and really helped to stabilize their offense.  There&#8217;s little reason to expect that to change against an average Portland defense.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Advantage: </strong>Milwaukee</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Power Forward<br />
</em><strong>Ersan Ilyasova vs. Dante Cunningham</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">If Portland&#8217;s centers are both out &#8211; both are listed as questionable &#8211; then Cunningham will get the start at the four with Aldridge moving over to the five.  Cunningham is only in his second year, but he appears on the way to a journeyman power forward career.  He does some things well, he can shoot it a little bit and grab some boards, but he&#8217;s undersized and lacks a particular stunning talent.  Ilyasova should be able to rebound from a rough night against the monstrous Jazz front line.  He needs to get going early though, so as not to see Drew Gooden steal away his minutes once again.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Advantage: </strong>Milwaukee</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Center<br />
</em><strong>Andrew Bogut vs. LaMarcus Aldridge</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">If both Camby and Przybilla miss the game with injuries, Aldridge or Cunningham will be matched up defensively with Bogut and give up significant size.  Aldridge thrives on the mid range jump shot, so Bogut may opt for the less prolific offensive player Cunningham when he&#8217;s on defense.  When the Bucks have the ball though, look for them to establish Bogut early and often.  He&#8217;s been on a roll lately and Milwaukee has performed well when they&#8217;ve been able to feed Bogut the ball.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Advantage: </strong>Milwaukee</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Bench</em><br />
<strong>Drew Gooden, Earl Boykins, Luc Mbah a Moute, Larry Sanders </strong>and <strong>Jon Brockman</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">vs.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Armon Johnson, Patty Mills, Sean Marks </strong>and<strong> Luke Babbitt</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Portland is perilously low on reserves with as many as five players slated to miss Monday night&#8217;s game.  Of the three, Mills has played best lately, giving teams a significantly different look than Miller at the one with his speed and quickness.  Gooden has outplayed Ilyasova the last few games and could see big minutes again if Ilyasova is missing shots and unsure of himself early.  Boykins hasn&#8217;t played much over the past eight games, but could see more than spot minutes with Jennings out.  <strong>Corey Maggette </strong>is not with the team after a <strong>Raja Bell </strong>knee to the head had him suffering some concussive symptoms.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Advantage: </strong>Bucks</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Prediction: </strong>Bucks 93 &#8211; Blazers 89</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Milwaukee has another golden opportunity on the road against an ailing Blazers team.  Only Brandon Roy has been declared out for this one, but the Bucks could luck out and see as many as five Blazers rotation players watching this one from the sidelines.  The Bucks haven&#8217;t had to play without Jennings since his arrival, so it will be interesting to see how the team responds to a new floor leader for the majority of the night.  Dooling&#8217;s uptick in minutes and production lately provides some reason to be optimistic about their odds sans starting point guard though.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Jeremy Schmidt writes the Milwaukee Bucks blog Bucksketball.com.                  Follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/Bucksketball" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.      Then become a fan on Facebook (in the             sidebar).</em></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/12/game-26-preview-bucks-at-blazers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Numbers don&#8217;t add up for Bucks: Blazers 90 &#8211; Bucks 76</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/11/numbers-dont-add-up-for-bucks-blazers-90-bucks-76/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/11/numbers-dont-add-up-for-bucks-blazers-90-bucks-76/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Delfino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Maggette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Salmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Batum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trail Blazers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap/Box Score/Enemy
It’s difficult to even break everything that happened after the first quarter of the Bucks 90-76 loss Tuesday night into words.  Let’s just take a simple look at the numbers.
11-20: The respectable showing Milwaukee had from the field in the first quarter.
16-52: Milwaukee’s field goals made and attempted after the first quarter.  Milwaukee went [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=301102015" target="_blank">Recap</a>/<a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=301102015" target="_blank">Box Score</a>/<a href="http://portlandroundballsociety.com" target="_blank">Enemy</a></p>
<p>It’s difficult to even break everything that happened after the first quarter of the Bucks 90-76 loss Tuesday night into words.  Let’s just take a simple look at the numbers.</p>
<p>11-20: The respectable showing Milwaukee had from the field in the first quarter.</p>
<p>16-52: Milwaukee’s field goals made and attempted after the first quarter.  Milwaukee went from shot 55% in the first quarter and just 31% the rest of the game.</p>
<p>2-14: <strong>John Salmons</strong> shooting line for the evening.  Everyone knows by now that Salmons is working his way back into the lineup after a knee injury that shelved him for all of the pre-season, but injury or not, if he’s going to do this kind of damage to the Bucks chances to win a game, it’s worthwhile to question whether or not he should be active.  Everything about Salmons seems off.  When he catches for open shots in the corner, he drives hesitantly into the paint, not sure whether to shoot a fallaway jumper or attack with a move that won’t draw a foul thanks to his lack of explosiveness right now.  It doesn’t look like Salmons trusts his long range shot, and it’s not tough to see why.  After Tuesday’s 0-4 performance, Salmons is now shooting just 25% on 3-pointers this year, by far the worst he’s shot in his career.  Salmons confidence in himself on the court is not evident and it’s showing in the results.</p>
<p>3-15: Milwaukee’s futile efforts at successfully shooting 3-point shots.  There’s some upside here though: one player hit all three of their threes!  <strong>Carlos Delfino </strong>finished the evening 3-5 from deep, continuing his phenomenal shooting performance this season.  Unfortunately, <strong>Nicolas Batum</strong> got very serious after some first quarter lapses that saw Delfino finish with 11 points (4-5 FG 2-3 3FG).  After the end of the first quarter, Delfino could hardly breathe without Batum finishing his breath, much less get an open look from deep.  Batum played some of the most physical off ball defense I’ve seen in quite some time and played a big role in keeping the Bucks lone consistent 3-point threat this season from getting many touches.  After the first quarter, Delfino went just 1-3 from the field with one made 3-pointer.  Salmons and <strong>Brandon Jennings</strong> each missed all four of their attempts.  So much for Jennings’ consistency.<span id="more-2144"></span></p>
<p>16-17: Assists and turnovers for Milwaukee.  Through four games, the Bucks now have 67 assists and 61 turnovers, good for a 1.1/1 assist to turnover ratio.  Last season, Milwaukee had a 1.6/1 ratio.  It’s safe to say at this point, Milwaukee hasn’t been sharing the ball with much success.  Jennings does the heavy lifting when it comes to creating shots for the Bucks on most nights, but he had an unusually poor night taking care of the ball on Tuesday, turning it over six times.  An unsettling sight for Milwaukee has to be everyone else’s commitment to moving the ball though.  No player who has received significant playing time outside of Jennings (43.3 heading into Tuesday) and Salmons (12.5) has an assist rate better than 10%.  <strong>Keyon Dooling</strong> has struggled mightily facilitating anything as the backup point guard and Delfino has gone from creator to shooter.  Milwaukee needs someone else creating shots for teammates aside from Jennings.</p>
<p>97-86: Portland’s bench tallied 11 more minutes than Milwaukee’s but completely destroyed them in terms of production.  Portland’s bench: 43 points, five 3-pointers, 15 rebounds,12 assists and four turnovers.  Milwaukee’s bench: 31 points, 0 3-pointers, 12 rebounds, four assists and seven turnovers.  Before the game Coach<strong> Scott Skiles</strong> said they certainly thought coming into the season that their bench would be a strength, but guys would need to play well when they were in the game.  Very few players on Milwaukee’s bench did that Tuesday.</p>
<p>4-12: In the second quarter, Milwaukee was 4-12 inside the paint.  4-12 from INSIDE THE PAINT!  Those aren’t bad shots!  They are the ones teams want!  Milwaukee just couldn’t figure out how to make them end up at the bottom of the net rather than in the hands of the Blazers.  Portland had a hand in Milwaukee’s struggles, blocking four shots in the quarter, but Milwaukee did a heckuva job shooting themselves in the foot (as opposed to shooting the ball through the hoop) during the quarter.  The Bucks were just 8-20 at the rim for the game as well.  <strong>Corey Maggette</strong> struggled the most against a big Portland front line, going just 1-5 at the rim.  Could Milwaukee&#8217;s smallish front courts be catching up to them very early this year?</p>
<p>None of the numbers were very kind to the Bucks Tuesday evening.  And with a date in Boston looming tomorrow night, they are staring directly at yet another scary stat: a 1-4 record.</p>
<p><em>Jeremy Schmidt writes the Milwaukee Bucks blog Bucksketball.com. Follow him on <a href="http://Twitter.com/Bucksketball" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.  Then become a fan of Bucksketball on Facebook (to the right).</em></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/11/numbers-dont-add-up-for-bucks-blazers-90-bucks-76/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game 36 Preview: Bucks at Blazers</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/01/game-36-preview-bucks-at-blazers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/01/game-36-preview-bucks-at-blazers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andre Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarcus Aldridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martell Webster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trail Blazers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Milwaukee Buck s (Scott Skiles) 15-20
(Probable) Inactives: Dan Gadzuric or Joe Alexander
at
Portland Trail Blazers (Nate McMillan) 23 -16
Inactives: Greg Oden, Joel Przybilla and Nicolas Batum
Date: 1/13/2010
Time: 9:00 (CST)
TV: FS Wisconsin
Match-Ups
Point Guard
Brandon Jennings vs. Andre Miller
That never ending run of injuries finally landed Miller in the starting lineup after a turbulent beginning with the Blazers and [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Milwaukee Buck s (Scott Skiles) 15-20</h2>
<p>(Probable) Inactives: Dan Gadzuric or Joe Alexander</p>
<h2>at</h2>
<h2>Portland Trail Blazers (Nate McMillan) 23 -16</h2>
<p>Inactives: Greg Oden, Joel Przybilla and Nicolas Batum</p>
<p><strong>Date: </strong>1/13/2010</p>
<p><strong>Time: </strong>9:00 (CST)</p>
<p><strong>TV: </strong>FS Wisconsin</p>
<h2>Match-Ups</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Point Guard</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Brandon Jennings vs. Andre Miller</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">That never ending run of injuries finally landed Miller in the starting lineup after a turbulent beginning with the Blazers and results seem to have been generally positive.  It&#8217;s hard to say it hasn&#8217;t been when a team has suffered as many injuries as Portland and is still six games above .500.  Starting for Portland hasn&#8217;t been much different than starting for Philly for Miller though, as he still cannot hit a three for the life of him: 21 percent on the year.  Miller&#8217;s three-point shooting is one of those phenomenons I&#8217;ll never understand.  How could an NBA point guard be so brutal?  Miller is generally pretty efficient though, running the show, getting to the line and playing good defense are all his things.  Look for him to attempt to take Jennings in the post here and there, as he likes to post up little guys like Jennings and then shoot the mid-range jumper.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Portland<span id="more-1051"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Shooting Guard</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Charlie Bell vs. Brandon Roy</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Roy hasn&#8217;t been wrecking the league on a nightly basis like he did last year, but he&#8217;s still been pretty good, evidenced by his first game against the Bucks this year.  He struggled with his shot all night, but when the game was on the line, Roy hit an incredible fall away shot that landed Portland in overtime.  He&#8217;ll be a load for Charlie Bell and I&#8217;d expect Luc Richard Mbah a Moute to see plenty of time on him.  Roy&#8217;s shot 50 percent or better in each of his last three games and made a combined 27 trips to the line in those contests, so Milwaukee may not be catching him at the most opportune moment.  Bell just needs to keep hitting three&#8217;s to balance this out a little bit even.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Blazers</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Small Forward</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Luc Richard Mbah a Moute vs. Martell Webster</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Webster, owner of one of the most pure three-point shots in the league, doesn&#8217;t spend a lot of time attacking the hoop.  More than half of his total shots have been from three-point range, so it will be important for the Bucks to keep running him off the arc and making him put it down before he can shoot it.  The Bucks are right on the edge of what you may call the &#8220;middle of the pack&#8221; in terms of defending the three; they&#8217;ve allowed teams to shoot 34.3 percent, good for 11th in the league.  I&#8217;d expect Portland to shoot their share of free throws in this game and if that&#8217;s happening and Webster is getting loose for open three&#8217;s, it&#8217;ll be all bad for Milwaukee.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Blazers</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Power Forward</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Ersan Ilyasova vs. LaMarcus Aldridge</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Aldridge did all sorts of nasty things to the Bucks when he dropped 31 and 11 on them earlier this year.  He&#8217;s a tough match-up for Milwaukee as he could get Bogut in foul trouble and he&#8217;s a little too big for Ersan to hang with.  With Przybilla out and Juwan Howard playing next to him, in theory he&#8217;s less of a threat and easier to focus on, but things don&#8217;t always work out like that.  Especially not since Howard&#8217;s shown a pulse and then some in his extra playing time.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Blazers</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Center</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Andrew Bogut vs. Juwan Howard</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">If Bogut&#8217;s struggles against Phoenix can be attributed to the pace of that contest then this should be a prime opportunity to make up for it.  The Blazers rank 30th in the league in pace and feature Juwan Howard, Aldridge, Jeff Pendergraph and Dante Cunningham up front.  This game screams 30 points for Bogut.  Milwaukee will need to go to him early and often to take advantage of the constant size disparity between Bogut and whichever power forward masquerading as a center is guarding him.  If he doesn&#8217;t finish this game with 20 shots I&#8217;ll be seriously disappointed.  The Blazers will have to double team Bogut all night, so open shots could be the pleasant result of those extra men flying at Bogut.  The shooters will need to be ready and Bogut will have to be aggressive.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Bench</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Luke Ridnour, Hakim Warrick, Kurt Thomas </strong>and<strong> Jodie Meeks</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>vs.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Jeff Pendergraph, Steve Blake, Dante Cunningham, Rudy Fernandez </strong>and <strong>Jerryd Bayless</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Bayless can get buckets in bunches, that is, when his playing time is there.  For whatever reason he languishes in some kind of nether, struggling to get consistent minutes, despite often producing when he receives them.  Chalk it up to him being young I guess.  Blake had a recent bout with pneumonia, but will play in this game and <strong>Rudy Fernandez </strong>appears to be looking like a go.  Word is he&#8217;ll be limited to 5-7 minutes a half though, fortunately.  Warrick and Ridnour have been destroying the competition lately, with Warrick doing all the things Milwaukee expected him to do for a long time.  Mainly, dunking and running around.  I&#8217;d love to see some more Jennings/Warrick moments this evening.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Milwaukee</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Prediction: Blazers 93 &#8211; Bucks 86</h2>
<p>Blazers too good at home, Bucks too bad on the road.  That&#8217;s how I&#8217;ll classify this game.  I do expect Milwaukee to battle hard and take some momentum with them into Golden State though, where a win in entirely possible.  If the Bucks second unit plays to their absolute maximum potential this evening though, this could turn in the Bucks favor real quick.  The problem is, I wouldn&#8217;t expect to see too much of the Portland bench.  Portland&#8217;s starters have been playing around 40 minutes a night lately, largely nullifying the Bucks second most significant advantage.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2010/01/game-36-preview-bucks-at-blazers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bucks Win A Thriller: Bucks 108 &#8211; Blazers 101</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/12/bucks-win-a-thriller-bucks-108-blazers-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/12/bucks-win-a-thriller-bucks-108-blazers-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andre Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Przybilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarcus Aldrdige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Ridnour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Redd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trail Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott SKiles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap/Box Score
Let&#8217;s go through our checklist for what makes a classic regular season game (and I mean for the teams, not in terms of the entire league):

Two overtimes

A lot of NBA games go into overtime.  Teams usually end up going into overtime somewhere between five and ten times a season (the Bucks did it four [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sports-ak.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=291212015" target="_blank">Recap</a>/<a href="http://sports-ak.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=291212015" target="_blank">Box Score</a></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go through our checklist for what makes a classic regular season game (and I mean for the teams, not in terms of the entire league):</p>
<ul>
<li>Two overtimes</li>
</ul>
<p>A lot of NBA games go into overtime.  Teams usually end up going into overtime somewhere between five and ten times a season (the Bucks did it four times last year).  Going into overtime in itself is nothing special.  Two overtimes?  Now I&#8217;m listening.  Regardless of whether the game is intra-divison, out of conference or whatever, it&#8217;s going to hold some appeal.  The last time the Bucks went into double overtime was December 17th of 2007.  So this is not an everyday situation.  <strong>Check.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Memorable plays</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Andrew Bogut&#8217;s </strong>tip (actually, his NOT tip).  <strong>Brandon Roy&#8217;s </strong>fall away jumper to tie it with 12 seconds to go in regulation.  <strong>Brandon Jennings&#8217; </strong>pull-up jumper to tie it with four seconds left in the first overtime.  Jennings Nashian lay-up with 43 seconds to go in the second OT.  Yeah, we had a number of memorable plays in this one and I haven&#8217;t even mentioned Jennings&#8217; floater near the end of regulation or a number of big dunks late from <strong>LaMarcus Aldridge.  Check.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Memorable Moments</li>
</ul>
<p>Beyond the shots that we&#8217;ll remember for the rest of the season, we were treated to a few tense instant replay ref calls.  Was Bogut&#8217;s tip shot at the end of regulation good?  It wasn&#8217;t, but it was fun waiting for the refs to tell us whether or not he touched it before the buzzer went off.  Did <strong>Luc Richard Mbah a Moute </strong>tip the ball out of bounds in the first overtime with the Bucks down two, or did Aldridge hit it last?  The tape wasn&#8217;t super clear, but it did appear Aldridge&#8217;s fingers were the last thing the ball touched in play.  Squad Six had the building rocking by starting a &#8220;this way&#8221; chant while pointing in the Bucks direction.  Soon everyone else joined in on the fun and the arena filled with electricity.  <strong>Check.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Significance</li>
</ul>
<p>Was there any better way for Jennings to get his very first NBA double-double than in a double overtime win at home?  I say no.  Jennings has always fed off the energy of the Bucks crowd and today was no different.  Especially when he got it going in the third quarter to the tune of 12 points after not even attempting a shot in the first half.  Jennings would finish with 18 points and 11 assists.  <strong>Check.</strong></p>
<p>While regular season games only hold so much significance in the long run (I&#8217;d never compare this game to any of the great playoff games of recent years) this one was still fun to watch.  If you missed it, you likely won&#8217;t be able to catch a better Bucks game this year, which is actually pretty wild, since I didn&#8217;t find the first half to be all that special.  I mean, it wasn&#8217;t bad, Bogut had it going and the Bucks were playing better defense than they had in some time, but I never suspected I&#8217;d be thinking of this one as a classic when it was all said and done.  That&#8217;s the beauty of sports I guess.<span id="more-953"></span></p>
<h2>Offense</h2>
<ul>
<li>Bogut was a beast.  He again showed a nice array of post moves and did it against a very legitimate defender in <strong>Joel Przybilla. </strong>27 points and nine boards on 12-19 shooting.  Another nice night for Bogut, who&#8217;s followed three bad efforts with three fairly strong ones (the Raptors game was so out of hand he didn&#8217;t really need to assert himself).  Even better was the big night coming against the length and strength of the Blazers big center Przybilla.  Bogut had been struggling against some of the better defenders at the center position and had something to say on the matter after the game:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve heard people say that, but that doesn&#8217;t really bother me.  I&#8217;ve had bad games against guys that are long and I&#8217;ve had bad games &#8230;  you know, I had a bad game against Ben Wallace and he&#8217;s 6&#8242;9.  So I don&#8217;t really buy into that.  Bad game, good games tonight it was just good to get the win man, I mean, like I said we showed a lot of character tonight.  Last year&#8217;s team probably would have, uh, bit the dust when (the Blazers lead) was six points.</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li><strong>Luke Ridnour </strong>appears to have discovered some kind of basketball secret.  That&#8217;s the only way to logically explain some of the moves he&#8217;s been making and shots he&#8217;s been hitting this year.  In 22 minutes, Ridnour scored 20 points and had a lot to do with the Bucks coming back from down six in the first overtime.  Ridnour checked in for <strong>Michael Redd </strong>at 2:38 and proceeded to hit a runner 11 seconds later.  Luke scored six more in the second overtime including a ridiculous 19-foot jumper with the scored tied at 97 that he had no business sinking.  But he did it anyway, because that&#8217;s the 2009-10 Luke Ridnour apparently.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>So, Michael Redd is back.  Redd doing a few Redd things here and there, meaning he&#8217;s occasionally holding the ball a little longer than he should or taking a shot a liiiitle too quick off of a screen, making it tougher than it needs to be.  A good example came early in his first entry when he made  a tough leaner.  Yes, the shot went in and he could have been awarded a free throw too, but is that really the shot the Bucks want?  Maybe two or three years ago that was a good option, but now the Bucks have the ability to get a little better shot, especially when Bogut is on.  It’s an interesting debate at this point.  Boos rained down Redd missed two free throws,  a sign that patience has worn thin, and a quick turn from the applause that greeted his return to the court when he checked in in the first quarter.  There was one nice sequence where Bogut kicked out to Jennings who swung it to Redd for three, pretty much exactly what the Bucks had hoped for when Redd came back.  Redd finished with 11 poitns on 5-11 shooting, but a team worst -11 plus/minus.  Coach <strong>Scott Skiles</strong> take before the game on Redd&#8217;s return:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;re 10-11 and trying to get to .500.  If we were 15-5 and looked like a cohesive unit every game I might say it&#8217;s a little bit of a concern, but Michael&#8217;s a good player and we&#8217;re happy to have another good player back.  To me it&#8217;s simple.  We need Michael to defend his spot, which we expect from everybody but have struggled to do recently, and make shots.  We have a lot of open shots right now in every game, we have good ball movement, the ball is moving around the perimeter and you know, we need a guy like Michael to make open shots.</p></blockquote>
<h2>Defense</h2>
<ul>
<li>Aldridge gave the Bucks problems all night long.  31 points on 13-22 shooting.  He worked <strong>Ersan Ilyasova </strong>and LRMAM repeatedly, caught alley-oops and was able to get out ahead of the pack for dunks using his terrific speed.  The Bucks, trying to keep Bogut in the game, opted not to throw the Aussie at Aldridge after he picked up a couple fouls early.  Aldridge was way too much for the typically solid defender Ilyasova and was too big for LRMAM.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Portland continued their domination on the glass, winning the rebounding battle 52-44 over Milwaukee.  The Bucks are now 4-10 when being out-rebounded.  Aldridge and Przybilla led the way with 11 and ten respectively.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I&#8217;m not so certain this is great defense or if it&#8217;s just bad play calling, but some how or another the Blazers ended up going with <strong>Andre Miller</strong> for a three with 32 seconds left down five.  The same Andre Miller I refuse to cover in NBA 2K10 because he&#8217;s such a bad outside shooter.  The same Andre Miller who once shot just under nine percent on three&#8217;s for a season.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Final Thoughts</h2>
<p>For the Bucks to come back and win this one after being down six in overtime says a lot about their fight.  It seemed awfully glum at that point, but coach Skiles made the correct subs and saw Ridnour and <strong>Carlos Delfino </strong>connect on numerous important shots down the stretch.  He also saw Delfino rip the ball from Roy&#8217;s hands on a drive to the hoop in the second overtime after he took over defensive duties on the Blazer&#8217;s best player.  Sometimes a coach is just able to push the right buttons and have it all work out.  That was the situation in OT for the Bucks.</p>
<p>Now, with three days off before the Lakers come to town the Bucks have a great opportunity to get Mike Redd more at ease with his new role in the offense and the rest of the players more at ease with Redd through a couple practices.  As odd as it sounds, these three days off may be as important to the Bucks as any games they&#8217;ve played recently.  If the Bucks can get Redd comfortable and keep Jennings and Bogut fed, they might have an offense capable of picking up it&#8217;s end of the bargain with a little more consistency on nights the defense does it&#8217;s job.  But that&#8217;s for Monday and Tuesday.  For Sunday?  The Bucks have earned a chance to rest in as dramatic fashion as they have all year.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/12/bucks-win-a-thriller-bucks-108-blazers-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game 21 Preview: Bucks vs. Blazers</title>
		<link>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/12/game-21-preview-bucks-vs-blazers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/12/game-21-preview-bucks-vs-blazers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bogut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Gadzuric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ersan Ilyasova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Przybilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarcus Aldridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martell Webster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Redd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Trail Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Blake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucksketball.com/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Portland Trail Blazers (Nate McMillan) 14-10
(Likely) Inactives: Greg Oden, Travis Outlaw, Patrick Mills
at
Milwaukee Bucks (Scott Skiles) 10-11
(Likely) Inactives: Joe Alexander, Francisco Elson and Dan Gadzuric?
Date: 12/12/2009
Time: 7:00 (CST)
TV: FS Wisconsin
Match-Ups
Point Guard
Brandon Jennings vs. Steve Blake
Blake has retained the starting spot despite the off-season acquisition of Andre Miller.  Blake is a better shooter and can work [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Portland Trail Blazers (Nate McMillan) 14-10</h2>
<p>(Likely) Inactives: Greg Oden, Travis Outlaw, Patrick Mills</p>
<h2>at</h2>
<h2>Milwaukee Bucks (Scott Skiles) 10-11</h2>
<p>(Likely) Inactives: Joe Alexander, Francisco Elson and Dan Gadzuric?</p>
<p><strong>Date: </strong>12/12/2009</p>
<p><strong>Time: </strong>7:00 (CST)</p>
<p><strong>TV: </strong>FS Wisconsin</p>
<h2>Match-Ups</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Point Guard</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Brandon Jennings vs. Steve Blake</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Blake has retained the starting spot despite the off-season acquisition of Andre Miller.  Blake is a better shooter and can work off the ball a little better, which allows Brandon Roy to do a lot more ball handling, something he enjoys.  Blake&#8217;s primary requirement is to stand off the ball and get ready to shoot open three&#8217;s.  He&#8217;s having a slightly down year at 37 percent, but can knock them down with pretty good regularity on the right night.  Jennings had a strong game against Toronto and has performed very well at home this year.  The Blazers will likely look to contain him and are a pretty good defensive squad.  They held the high scoring <strong>Aaron Brooks </strong>to six points on nine attempts the game following center Greg Oden&#8217;s injury, so they&#8217;ve had at least some success against high scoring point guards this year.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks<span id="more-935"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Shooting Guard</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Carlos Delfino vs. Brandon Roy</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Roy isn&#8217;t a shooting guard.  He&#8217;s an everything guard.  He&#8217;s the prototype for successful combo guards.  He uses his handle and muscle to lead the Blazers in assists and rank fourth in rebounding on the team.  He scores 21 a night and shoots nearly one free throw for every two shots.  Translation: he likes to get in the paint and do work.  He hasn&#8217;t been quite as spectacular this year as he was last and part of the reason is, while he still does work inside, he hasn&#8217;t been getting to the rim as much.  He&#8217;s averaging two fewer attempts at the rim a night than he did last year.  If Roy only takes four shots at the rim Saturday night, the Bucks will be in great shape, but that may just be wishful thinking.  I&#8217;d look for him to attack the Bucks off the dribble and capitalize on Milwaukee&#8217;s tendency to foul everyone and everything.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Blazers</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Small Forward</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Luc Richard Mbah a Moute vs. Martell Webster</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Webster and LRMAM may be total opposites.  Webster makes his living shooting three&#8217;s and from what I understand, is an inconsistent defender.  LRMAM makes his living on defense and from what I know, is an inconsistent shooter.  Regardless, don&#8217;t expect to see these two matched up very often when Portland has the ball.  It&#8217;s going to be LRMAM who gets the call when Brandon Roy gets the ball.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Power Forward</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Ersan Ilyasova vs. LaMarcus Aldridge</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Aldridge may see some time at center when he&#8217;s on the court without Przybilla and that&#8217;s where he really can cause problems.  With his agility and shooting prowess he&#8217;s a mismatch waiting to happen.  Kind of like <strong>Kevin Garnett</strong>, or <strong>Chris Bosh. </strong>Hey!  The Bucks just saw both of them!  I&#8217;d think Ilyasova gets the call on him, but I thought that about Bosh too and Bogut saw a lot of minutes matched up with him.  Interesting to see how Skiles plays this one.  Ilyasova will have to be pesky and crashing the boards again Saturday to minimize the Blazers rebounding advantage.  Portland leads the league in rebounding differential at plus five.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Portland</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Center</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Andrew Bogut vs. Joel Przybilla</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">What can I say about Przybilla?  He&#8217;s developed into exactly what Milwaukee hoped for when they drafted him in 2000.  Too bad he&#8217;s done it elsewhere.  With Oden out Pryz has seen an increase in minutes and a slight increase in rebounds, but hasn&#8217;t been the shot-blocker he&#8217;s shown himself to be in year&#8217;s past.  He may have dialed it down a notch knowing the Blazers are thin in the front court after numerous injuries.  If he gets into the foul trouble the Blazers are, well, screwed to put it bluntly.  Long, strong and athletic centers have been giving Bogut problems lately, so this is a good chance for him to show he can get it done more consistently regardless of who he is facing.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Bench</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Luke Ridnour, Hakim Warrick, Michael Redd </strong>and <strong>Roko Ukic<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>vs.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Andre Miller, Juwan Howard </strong>and <strong>Jerryd Bayless</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">The Bucks will be faced with an interesting conundrum when filling out their lineup on Saturday night.  Now that Redd is back and <strong>Roko Ukic </strong>has earned a few minutes, the question becomes, who will be inactive?  Logic suggests <strong>Dan Gadzuric. </strong>The Blazers, while young, are a deliberate team and don&#8217;t play a style suited for Gadz to have a successful night.  Skiles did say last Wednesday that Ukic would get some time and Redd is reportedly going to make his re-re-debut on Saturday.  The Blazers have been struck upside the head with an injury two-by-four this year and are down to their free agent signing Andre Miller, the journeyman Juwan Howard and disgruntled second-year guard Jerryd Bayless.  The Bucks will be as deep Saturday as they&#8217;ve been all year.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Advantage: Bucks</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Prediction: Bucks 94 &#8211; Blazers 86</h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">You won&#8217;t see the Bucks hand the Blazers any tissue if they want to weep about their injury situation.  Not that they ever would with tough guy Roy and the hard lined Nate McMillan leading them.  But, the Blazers ARE sapped of healthy players and at the tail end of a four game road trip to the East.  The stars are aligned for the Bucks to pull this one off.  It&#8217;s practically an opportunity they can&#8217;t let slip by, especially given the two days rest they&#8217;ve had leading up to Saturday.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bucksketball.com/2009/12/game-21-preview-bucks-vs-blazers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

