Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Utah Jazz’

Avert your eyes and hide the children: Utah Jazz 85 – Milwaukee Bucks 73

January 3rd, 2012 Jeremy Schmidt 5 comments
Milwaukee Bucks 73 Final

Recap | Box Score

85 Utah Jazz
Stephen Jackson, SG 5-17 FG | 5-6 FT | 6 REB | 4 AST | 16 PTS | -12

Things did not go well for Jackson. He’s holding the ball a ton over the past two games after making quick decisions over and over when the Bucks were thriving in transition against the Wizards. He’s forcing drives into traffic, he’s missing shots. Over the past two games, he’s been John Salmons.

Ersan Ilyasova, PF 2-9 FG | 2-2 FT | 8 REB | 1 AST | 7 PTS | -2

Overmatched. That’s the easiest way to define Ilyasova’s night. He had trouble banging with Paul Millsap and Al Jefferson all night. The eight rebounds are nice, but they mean little when you look at how many rebounds were available Tuesday night.

Drew Gooden, PF 12-20 FG | 0-0 FT | 12 REB | 1 AST | 24 PTS | -6

Gooden had a terrific statistical game full of bonehead lapses. For every tip shot he fought to put in, for every long jumper he hit, there was an airballed shot he tried to draw a foul on or a silly foul of a Jazz big man that had blown by him. He was the Bucks offense though, so there’s that.

Carlos Delfino, SF 0-7 FG | 2-2 FT | 4 REB | 3 AST | 2 PTS | +3

An oh-for for Delfino. His drives resulted in wild shots in the paint. His threes weren’t falling and he was often standing around off the ball. For whatever reason, Milwaukee hasn’t been able to run with Delfino in the lineup like they did with Dunleavy. Small sample size and defensive stops figure into this, but he certainly lacks the movement and passing skills Dunleavy has.

Brandon Jennings, PG 4-19 FG | 0-1 FT | 6 REB | 6 AST | 8 PTS | -14

With Bogut out, a nation of Bucks fans turned their lonely eyes to Brandon Jennings. They’ll need sunglasses. Jennings’ layup that failed to so much as hit the rim in the fourth quarter summed his night up. It’s nice that Jennings competes hard all game, but if that’s all he has going for him in a game, that’s a problem. The past two games have been a rough regression for Jennings.

Four Things We Saw

  1. The theory goes something like, if an important player is out, it’s just an opportunity for someone else to step up. I thought about this when Al Jefferson drove by Drew Gooden at one point in the second quarter and Gooden jumped and windmilled his arm into the driving Jefferson. In short the Milwaukee reserves failed to step up with Andrew Bogut, Beno Udrih and Mike Dunleavy out.
  2. No Udrih and no Dunleavy left the Bucks with no three-point shooting. At least no accuracy. Milwaukee made just two of 19 threes. Stephen Jackson connected on one of seven attempts. He is now 5-26 on threes this season. Brandon Jennings missed on all seven of his attempts. He is now 5-28 this season from deep. Oh, and the Bucks shot 30.5% as a team. Sigh.
  3. Milwaukee found themselves trailing by two and three repeatedly in the third and fourth quarter, but never found a way to close the gap. Each time they’d string together enough to cut the Jazz lead, they’d follow with turnovers or missed shots. Without Bogut or the terrific version of Brandon Jennings we saw in the first three games of the season, Milwaukee looked lost when they needed baskets the most.
  4. What we didn’t see was Jon Leuer. Despite Bogut’s absence for personal reasons, Leuer played just six minutes. Hopefully that isn’t due to some injury that’s yet to be reported, but when factoring in how things have gone for the Bucks over the past year, who knows.

Game 25 Preview: Bucks vs. Jazz

December 18th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt Comments off

Enemy: Salt City Hoops

Point Guard
Brandon Jennings vs. Deron Williams

Williams is coming off a rough night in New Orleans against arch-rival Chris Paul. The Jazz fell to the Hornets by 29 and Williams was held to just 10 points and five assists.  Surely, he’ll be looking to right the ship in Milwaukee.  Jennings was instrumental in the Bucks fourth quarter comeback in San Antonio, but was unfortunately just as instrumental in the Bucks needing a comeback.  He made just four of 18 shots against the Spurs, lacking the touch he’d shown frequently in the games before.  Jennings is getting closer and closer to a reliable 40% shooter, which, when compared to his first season, isn’t such a bad thing.  Especially for a 21-year-old.

Advantage: Jazz Read more…

Hellacious Home Court: Bucks 95 – Jazz 87

March 13th, 2010 Jeremy Schmidt 2 comments

Recap/Box Score

I was driving home to get ready for the game Friday night when I couldn’t help but find myself thinking of my prediction for the evening.  I had the Bucks losing by one.  The Jazz had been so good as of late and the Bucks seemed to be due to drop one.  But it was gnawing at me a little bit.  I couldn’t help but think of the number nine.  The Bucks had only lost nine home games coming into their tilt with the Jazz Friday night, and the number nine is even a little bit deceiving.

The Mavericks (Dirk), Lakers (Kobe) and Kings (Tyreke Evans) all barely escaped the BC with wins early in the season thanks to last second heroics.  Milwaukee was in position to win and got unlucky at the buzzer.  The Magic came to Milwaukee while Andrew Bogut was down with a leg injury and won by two.  That’s four losses that don’t really bother me.

So coming into Friday night’s game, 63 games into the season, the Bucks had five legit home losses, each coming before the arrival of John Salmons and after the clock had struck midnight on Brandon Jennings great start.

But Salmons is here, Jennings has gone from prince to pauper to pro and the Bucks showed me the error in my thinking.  This was a very good home team early in the season, but now I’ll be shocked when (if?) they drop another in Milwaukee.  The fans had the BC as loud as it’s been in years Friday night and the Bucks rewarded their loyalty by closing out the second (or third) best team in the West.

The home locker room in Milwaukee seems to have the obligatory quiet confidence (well, loud confidence in Jennings’ case) in their group to know they won’t be losing at home the rest of this season.  To be honest, they know a lot more about the team than I do, so who am I to argue? Read more…